Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025)
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Criminal Liability and Business Judgment Rule in Indonesia’s Sovereign Wealth Fund: The Case of BPI Danantara

Authors

Parameshwara , Ramlan , Khairul Riza

DOI:

10.5281/ijerlas.v3i3.896

Published:

2023-06-14 — Updated on 2025-11-30

Downloads

Abstract

This article examines the issue of criminal liability of corporate executives within the structure of Indonesia’s Sovereign Wealth Fund, particularly BPI Danantara, in relation to investment losses and anti-corruption enforcement. It highlights how regulatory inconsistencies and institutional overlap complicate legal accountability when public wealth is managed through a private corporate model. The purpose of this article is to critically analyze the legal construction of executive responsibility in BPI Danantara by examining the interplay between the Business Judgment Rule (BJR), the principle of public accountability, and the current limitations of corruption law enforcement in Indonesia. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, historical, and case-based approaches. Legal sources include primary laws and constitutional court rulings, supported by secondary materials such as legal journals and authoritative commentaries. Analysis is conducted through juridisch denken (legal reasoning) to assess the consistency of norms. The findings of this study reveal that the current legal framework provides de jure protection to executives under the BJR, but in the absence of oversight and transparency, it may foster legal impunity. The classification of state-invested assets as private capital under BPI Danantara limits the scope of criminal liability, highlighting the urgent need for harmonization between corporate governance standards and anti-corruption legal norms in the context of sovereign wealth fund operations.

Keywords:

Evidence Justice Collaborator Crime

References

Achmad Ali. Menguak Teori Hukum Dan Teori Peradilan. 1st ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2020.

———. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence). 1st ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2022.

Angga, La Ode, Barzah Latupono, Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun, and Sabri Fataruba. “Effectiveness of Law Number 41 the Year 1999 in the Case of Illegal Logging in Maluku Province.” Cepalo 3, no. 2 (2019): 141–52. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v3no2.1848.

Berlianty, Teng. Hukum Organisasi Perusahaan. Sidoarjo: Zifatama Jawara, 2019.

Christyanti, B Lora. “PERUBAHAN REZIM HUKUM DAN RISIKO IMPUNITAS KORUPSI DI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA.” Jurnal Suara Keadilan 26, no. 1 (2025): 121–36.

Denny Indrayana. Konstitusi Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Transisi Politik Indonesia. Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara, 2016.

Fauzi, A. Business Judgment Rule Dalam Perspektif Hukum Korporasi Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.

———. Korporasi Dan Tindak Pidana Ekonomi: Konsep Dan Pertanggungjawaban Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2022.

Gunarsa, Aep, and B Arief Sidharta. “Meuwissen Tentang Pengembanan Hukum, Ilmu Hukum, Teori Hukum, Dan Filsafat Hukum.” Refika Aditama, 2013.

Hiariej, Eddy O S. “Korupsi Di Sektor Swasta Dan Tanggung Jawab Pidana Korporasi.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 49, no. 4 (2020): 333–44.

———. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana, 2022.

Hiariej, Eddy Omar Sharif. “United Nations Convention Against Corruption Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.” OLD WEBSITE OF JURNAL MIMBAR HUKUM 31, no. 1 (2019): 112–25.

Hiariej, Edward Omar Sharief, and M SH. “Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana.” Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka, 2016, 128–45.

Irawan, Chandra Noviardy, Pujiyono Pujiyono, and Irma Cahyaningtyas. “Implementation of Business Judgement Rules in Indonesia: Theories, Practices, and Contemporary Cases.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 4, no. 1 (April 26, 2022): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v4i1.53335.

Jamil, Irpan. “Negara Kesejahteraan (Welfare State) Dalam Konteks Kebijakan Politik Ekonomi Islam Di Indonesia.” El-Ecosy: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Islam 1, no. 2 (2021): 183–97.

Kamello, Tan. “Kajian Pidana Dalam Perbuatan Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Pemerintah Di Sumatera Utara,” 2006.

Labetubun, Muchtar Anshary Hamid. “A Legal Awareness of Copyright on Regional Song Creators.” International Journal of Law Reconstruction 5, no. 1 (2021): 49–61. https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v5i1.15406.

———. “Perlindungan Hukum HaKI Atas Desain Industri Terhadap Produk Kerajinan Kerang Mutiara Dalan Pemberdayaan Usaha Kecil Di Kota Ambon.” Universitas Brawijaya, 2010.

Lawrance M. Friedman. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 1975.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. “Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi Cet.” Ke-12. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2016.

Ni Made Sukmasari. “Ada Yang Khawatir Danantara Bisa Bernasib Sama Dengan 1MDB Malaysia: Kronologi Kasus 1MDB.” Tempo, February 28, 2025.

Parameshwara, Dr. (cand). “Implementation of Business Judgment Rule Doctrine In Indonesia.” IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science 21, no. 08 (August 2016): 17–26. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2108121726.

Parameshwara, Parameshwara, and Khairul Riza. “Ideal Management of Social Assistance Funds as a Prevention and Mitigation Effort Corruption.” Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic and Practice Studies 1, no. 1 (February 23, 2023): 83–91. https://doi.org/10.35912/jomaps.v1i1.1529.

———. “Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Konteks Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi (Corruption Crimes in the Context of Corporate Criminal Liability).” Jurnal Studi Multidisiplin Ilmu 1, no. 1 (2023): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.35912/jasmi.v1i1.1973.

Prastiwi, Mahar. “23 Berita Hoax Seputar Covid-19 Dan Penjelasan Pakar Pulmonologi UGM.” KOMPAS.com, 2021. https://www.kompas.com/edu/read/2021/03/25/080000171/23-berita-hoax-seputar-covid-19-dan-penjelasan-pakar-pulmonologi-ugm?page=all.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2010.

Respationo, Soerya, and Nar Yan Thapa. “Optimizing Regional Governance in Batam City Government-Business Entity Institutional Dualism.” SASI 30, no. 1 (2024): 87–99.

Salim, H S. “Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Tesis Dan Disertasi,” 2013.

Shanty, Lilik. “Aspek Teori Hukum Dalam KEJAHATAN KORPORASI.” PALAR (Pakuan Law Review) 3, no. 1 (2017).

Sjawie, Hasbullah F, and L L M SH. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Pada TIPIKOR. Prenada Media, 2018.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2021.

Subekti, R. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Direksi Dan Komisaris Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perseroan. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2022.

Widiarty, Wiwik Sri. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Direksi Berdasarkan Business Judment Rule Terhadap Kerugian Perusahaan Terbatas.” Rio LAW JURNAL 5, no. 1 (2024): 37–43.

Wijaya, Hendra, Budi Santoso, and Muhamad Azhar. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Atas Pencemaran Lingkungan Hidup.” Notarius 14, no. 1 (2021): 206–20.

Author Biographies

Parameshwara, Universitas Batam

Author Origin : Indonesia

Ramlan, Universitas Batam

Author Origin : Indonesia

Khairul Riza, STIE Krakatau

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Parameshwara, Ramlan, & Khairul Riza. (2025). Criminal Liability and Business Judgment Rule in Indonesia’s Sovereign Wealth Fund: The Case of BPI Danantara. International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS), 5(4), 1119–1131. https://doi.org/10.5281/ijerlas.v3i3.896

Similar Articles

<< < 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)