THE EFFECT OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP STYLE AND WORK MOTIVATION ON JOB SATISFACTION OF ASN AT BNN ACEH PROVINCE
Main Article Content
Rosdiana
Suryani Hardjo
Nina Siti Salmaniah
This research is based onThe aim is to determine the influence of transformational leadership style and work motivation on job satisfaction in civil servants inNational Narcotics Agency of Aceh Province. This study uses total sampling in selecting subjects. The subjects in this study were all employees atNational Narcotics Agency of Aceh Provinceas many as 100 people. There are three hypotheses proposed in this study: (1) There is a positive influence between transformational leadership style and job satisfaction, (2) There is a positive influence between work motivation and job satisfaction, (3) There is a positive influence between transformational leadership style and work motivation on job satisfaction. Based on the research results, there is a significant influence between transformational leadership style and job satisfaction. Where the R coefficient is0.381 and p = 0.000. The correlation is significant, meaning that if the transformational leadership style is high, job satisfaction is higher. The determinant coefficient R2 is0.145, meaning that 14.5% of job satisfaction is influenced by transformational leadership style. Based on the results of this study, it can be stated that the proposed hypothesis 1 is accepted. There is a significant influence of work motivation on job satisfaction. Where the R coefficient is 0.237 and p =0.018. The correlation is significant, meaning that if work motivation is high, job satisfaction is higher. The coefficient of determination R2as big as0.056, meaning that 5.6% of job satisfaction is influenced by work motivation. Together, the variables of transformational leadership style and work motivation have a significant influence on job satisfaction. This can be seen from the model summary table where the R coefficient is 0.427 and p = 0.000. This means that together the variable X1and X2 affects the Y variable. Based on the results of this study, the three hypotheses proposed in this study are declared accepted. The determinant coefficient R2 is0.183, meaning that 18.3% of job satisfaction is influenced by transformational leadership style and work motivation. While 81.7% is influenced by other factors that cannot be explained in the regression equation (residual).
As’ad, Moh. 2008. Psikologi Industri, edisi kelima. Yogyakarta : Liberty.
Gouzaly, Saydam. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Gunung Agung.
Gusri, R. F. (2017). ANALISIS KINERJA BADAN PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT, PEREMPUAN DAN KELUARGA BERENCANA (BPMPKB)
KOTA PADANG (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Andalas).
Hasibuan, Malayu SP. 1984. Manajemen Dasar, Pengertian dan masalah. Jakarta
: Bumi Aksara.
Herzberg, Frederick. 1967. Work and The Nature of Man. Cleveland And New York : The World Publishing Company.
Keith, Davis, Jhon W. Newstrom. 1995. Perilaku Dalam Organisasi, Edisi Ketujuh. Jakarta : Erlangga.
Labolo, Muhammad (2010). Memahami Ilmu Pemerintahan, Suatu Kajian Teori, Konsep dan Pengembangannya. Jakarta : RajaGrafindo Persada.
Maulidah, S. (2012). Pengantar Manajemen Agribisnis. Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Mangkunegara, AP. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung : Rosda.
Manullang, M. 1982. Dasar-dasar Manajemen. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia.
Nasution, Mustafa Edwin dan Hardius Usman. 2018. Proses Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta : Cetakan ketiga, FEUI.
Nitasari, R. A., & Lataruva, E. (2012). Analisis pengaruh motivasi kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan dengan kepuasan kerja sebagai variabel intervening pada PT. Bank Central Asia tbk. cabang kudus (Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis).
Pareek, Stephens. 1984. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta : PT. Pustaka Binaman Pressindo.
Purwanto , Erwan Agus dan Dyah Ratih Sulistyastuti. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta : Gava Media
Robbins, Stephens P. 1994. Organization Theory, Structure, Design and Application. Alih Bahasa Yusuf Udara, Jakarta : Arean.
. 1996. Perilaku Organisasi, jilid 1. Jakarta : PT. Prenhallindo.
. 1996. Organization Bahaviour, Seventh Edition. New Jersey : A Simon & Schuster Company, Englewood Cliffs, 07632.
. 1998. Perilaku Organisasi : Konsep Kontroversi Aplikasi. Jakarta : PT. Prenhallindo.
. 2013. Perilaku Organisasi, Jakarta : PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.
. 2016. Perilaku Organisasi , Jakarta : PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.
Sarwoto. 1979. Dasar-dasar Organisasi Management. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia. Shelton, Ken. Ed. 2012. Paradigma Baru Kepemimpinan : Berbagai Visi Luar
Biasa Bagi Organisasi Abad Ke-21. Jakarta : PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Siagian, Sondang P. 1983. Organisasi, Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku Adminsitrasi.
Jakarta : PT.Gunung Agung.
. 1987. Teori Motivasi dan Aplikasinya, Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
. 1999. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Singgih, Santoso. 2010. Mengolah Data Statistik Secara Profesional. Jakarta : PT Gramedia.
Wexley, Kenneth N dan Garry A. Yukl. 1992. Perilaku Organisasi dan Psikologi
Personalia edisi alih bahasa dari Organizational Behaviour and Personnel Psychology, oleh Muh. Shobarudin. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Yukl, Gary A. 1994. Kepemimpinan Dalam Organisasi edisi alih bahasa dari
Leadership in Organizations, oleh Jusuf Udaya. Jakarta : Prenhallindo.
Zenger, John H dan Joseph Folkman. The Handbook for Leaders : 24 Poin Penting Seputar Kepemimpinan yang Luar Biasa. Edisi alih Bahasa dari The Hanbook for Leaders : 24 Lessons for Extraordinary Leadership oleh Paul Alfried Rajoe. Jakarta : PT Bhuana Ilmu Populer.
Manurung, M. T., & Ratnawati, I. (2012). Analisis pengaruh stres kerja dan kepuasan kerja terhadap turnover intention karyawan (studi pada STIKES Widya Husada Semarang) (Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis).
Locke, E. A., Gruneberg, M., & Wall, T. (1984). Social psychology and organizational behavior. M. Gruneberg y T. Wall (Eds.), 93-117.
Bass, L., Meisel, N. A., & Williams, C. B. (2016). Exploring variability of orientation and aging effects in material properties of multi-material jetting parts. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 22(5), 826-834. Riggio,
Riggio. E. (2015). Teaching leadership: Most any psychologist can do it. Teaching of Psychology, 42(4), 361-367.
Marzuki, F. (2018). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional Dan Profesionalisme Kerja Terhadap Loyalitas Karyawan Di LP3I Group. Jurnal Lentera Bisnis, 7(1), 21-45.
Kosasih, A. R., & Kurniawan, J. E. (2019). Hubungan kepuasan kerja dan loyalitas pada karyawan.
Fatah, T. M. (2019). Motivasi Kerja Dan Motivasi Berhasil. An-Nidhom: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 58-66.
Davis, Keith. 1999.Fundamental Organizational Behavior. New Delhi: Magrow–Hill Company,
Dewi, A. H. (2017). Hubungan Lingkungan Kerja Fisik dengan Kepuasan Kerja Perawatan di RSU Haji Medan
Ruvendi, R. (2005). Imbalan dan gaya kepemimpinan pengaruhnya terhadap kepuasan kerja karyawan di Balai Besar Industri Hasil Pertanian Bogor. Jurnal ilmiah binaniaga, 1(1).
Smith, P. C., & Kendall, L. M. (1963). Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. Journal of applied psychology, 47(2), 149.
Anggraeni, Y., & Santosa, T. E. C. (2013). Pengaruh kepemimpinan transformasional terhadap kepuasan kerja karyawan. Jurnal dinamika ekonomi dan bisnis, 10(1).
Locke, E. A., Gruneberg, M., & Wall, T. (1984). Social psychology and organizational behavior. M. Gruneberg y T. Wall (Eds.), 93-117.
Subariyanti, H. (2017). Hubungan motivasi kerja dan kepuasan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan PTLR Batan. Jurnal Ecodemica: Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan Bisnis, 1(2), 224-232.
Tarjo, T. (2019). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. JAMIN: Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen Dan Inovasi Bisnis, 2(1), 53-65.
