IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GOVERNMENT AGENCY PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM (SAKIP) AT THE COMMUNICATION, INFORMATICS, CRYPTOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS SERVICE OF PALU CITY
DOI:
10.54443/morfai.v6i1.4728Published:
2025-12-23Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to determine the implementation of the government agency performance accountability system (SAKIP) policy at the Palu City Communication, Informatics, Cryptography, and Statistics Office. This study used qualitative methods with data collection techniques including observation, interviews, and documentation. Five subjects were selected through purposive sampling. The results indicate that, in terms of policy content, the implementation of SAKIP has had a positive impact on increasing effectiveness, efficiency, and performance accountability, as well as encouraging a transformation of work culture toward a results-oriented one. However, constraints remain in the form of limited human resources, both in terms of quantity and capacity for outcome-based performance, as well as limited budget for training and competency development. In terms of implementation context, SAKIP implementation is supported by a clear organizational structure, collaborative coordination between internal and external actors, and a high level of regulatory compliance. Although the work culture tends to be formal and bureaucratic, the agency is unable to implement cross-sectoral coordination and be responsive to external input. Public perception is influenced by four factors: motives, interests, experience, and expectations. In conclusion, SAKIP implementation at the Palu City Communications and Informatics Office has progressed in a positive direction, but requires continued strengthening of human resource capacity, inter-agency coordination, and optimization of information technology utilization to ensure a more effective, efficient, and sustainable performance accountability system.
Keywords:
Performance Accountability Palu City Communications and Informatics Office Implementation SAKIP.References
Grindle, Merilee S. (1980). Politics and Policy Implementation in the Third World. Princeton University Press.
A.A. Mangkunegara. 2017. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Perusahaan, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Afand
Creswell, John W. 2017. Research Design; Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed. Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications
Rahmah Ummur.2023. Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP) pada Badan Kesatuan Bangsa dan Politik Aceh.
Wibowo A. Fendik. 2022. Implementasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP) pada Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang Kabupaten Ponorogo.
Undang-undang 23 Tahun 2914 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 29 Tahun 2014 tentang SAKIP.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 8 Tahun 2006 tentang Pelaporan Keuangan dan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah.
Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi RI Nomor 53 Tahun 2014 tentang Petunjuk Teknis Perjanjian Kinerja, Pelaporan Kinerja Dan Tata Cara Reviu Atas Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (LAKIP).
Peraturan Menteri PANRB No. 88 Tahun 2021 tentang Evaluasi Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah,
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara.
Peraturan Wali Kota Nomor 11 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah.
Zahra A. 2024. EFektivitas Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (Sakip) Pada Dinas Komunikasi Dan Informatika Kabupaten Ciamis
Nur fitriani Sofyan 2025. Efektivitas Siatem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP) Meningkatkan Kinerja di Sekretariat jenderal Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia.
Akbar Rusdi 2025. Evaluasi Penerapan Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rahmawati, Mahfuzat, Darwis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




