TRANSFORMATION OF STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE SOLUTION IN THE PORT OPERATOR CORPORATION : A SCENARIO APPROACH
DOI:
10.54443/morfai.v6i2.4967Published:
2026-01-17Downloads
Abstract
This research existed as conducted to assess the compatibility of scenario planning to prepare plausible strategies for learning and consulting company that functions as part of an SOE port operator group, in developing its capabilities to meet the difficulties of fulfilling the parent company's mandate as an HR solution enabler. A qualitative research initiated by combine external environmental analysis using PESTEL and internal resource evaluation with the VRIO model to identify critical uncertainties that impact the company's strategic direction. These variables form the basis of a four-scenario matrix that captures a range of believable upcoming conditions. Each circumstance exists as advanced with detailed stories, calculated consequences, promptly warning signals, and reply possibilities. From the more extensive set of driving influences, two vital ambiguities stand as determined: the degree of calculated freedom granted to the corporation within the SOE group and the level of marketplace openness beyond the inside harbor operator ecosystem. The discoveries indicating that (1) advancement focuses vary notably between contexts but still demand a baseline, especially in terms of resource oversight capacities, strategy standardization, and business abilities; (2) Excessive dependency on third-party ability without a systematic inner competency roadmap poses long-term calculated risks; and (3) Gradual skill advancement, aligned with feasible upcoming conditions, empowers bodies to balance short-term efficiency necessities and performance targets with long-term calculated placement. The investigation concludes that context organization plays a essential position as a business approach tool while as well highlighting the importance of ordered skill construction that aligned with organization long-term tactical intent and institutional oversight restrictions.
Keywords:
Scenario Planning Strategic Management Capability Development Strategic AlignmentReferences
ndonesia. (2023), “Instruksi Presiden (Inpres) Nomor 5 Tahun 2020 tentang Penataan Ekosistem Logistik Nasional”, Presidential Instruction No. 5 of 2020 concerning the Structuring of the National Logistics Ecosystem (NLE), JDIH.SETKAB.GO.ID : 5 HLM..
[2] World Bank. (2023). Connecting to compete 2023: Trade logistics in an uncertain global economy. https://lpi.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/LPI_2023_report_with_layout.pdf.
[3] Sunitiyoso, Yos & Nuraeni, Shimaditya & Pambudi, Noorhan & Inayati, Tutik & Nurdayat, Ilham & Hadiansyah, Fikri & Tiara, Adhya. (2022). Port performance factors and their interactions: A systems thinking approach. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 38. 10.1016/j.ajsl.2022.04.001.List the reference here
[4] Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. MIT Press.
[5] Andrews, K. R. (1971). The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Dow Jones-Irwin.
[6] Eisenhardt, K. M., & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic Decision Making. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 17–37.
[7] Courtney, H., Kirkland, J., & Viguerie, P. (1997). Strategy Under Uncertainty. Harvard Business Review, 75(6), 67–79.
[8] Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1995). Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 25–40.
[9] Garvin, D. A., & Levesque, L. C. (2006). A Note on Scenario Planning. Harvard Business School Background Note, 306-003.
[10] Henderson, J.C. and Venkatraman, N. (1993) Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Tech-nology for Transforming Organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32, 4-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1147/sj.382.0472
[11] Teece, D. J. (2018). Business Models and Dynamic Capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49.
[12] O'Reilly, C. A., III, & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025.
[13] Tsang, E. W. K., & Zahra, S. A. (2008). Organizational Unlearning. Human Relations, 61(10), 1435–1462
[14] Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
[15] Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
[16] Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
[17] Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press
[18] Notteboom, Theo & Rodrigue, Jean-Paul. (2005). Port Regionalization: Towards a New Phase in Port Development. Maritime Policy & Management. 32. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830500139885
[19] UNCTAD. (2023). Review of Maritime Transport 2023. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
[20] Tambusai, M. (2005). Industrial relations series. International Labour Organization (ILO) reports. ISBN 92-2-016976-2List the reference here
[21] Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications
[22] Rothaermel, F. T., (2017), Strategic Management, New York, McGraw-Hill, 3 Education.
[23] Barney, J. (1991), "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage", Journal of Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 99-120.
[24] Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[25] Ramírez, R., & Wilkinson, A. (2016). Strategic Reframing: The Oxford Scenario Planning Approach. Oxford University Press.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Giswari Meisya Nabilah, Yos Sunitiyoso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
