HARMONISING NATIONAL ECONOMIC SOVEREIGNTY AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE STANDARDS THROUGH THE RECOGNITION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES TO NATURAL RESOURCES

Authors

Abdul Razak Nasution , Muhammad Juang Rambe , Rahul Ardian Fikri

Published:

2025-03-26

Downloads

Abstract

The application of extraterritorial non-tariff barriers within the international trade framework, such as the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), gives rise to jurisdictional conflicts regarding the principle of permanent sovereignty over the natural resources of developing countries. Such unilateral policies have implications for the vulnerability of the protection of the constitutional rights of Indigenous Peoples (IP) within the governance of commodity supply chains at the domestic level. This study aims to analyse the alignment of a state’s economic sovereignty with global environmental standards through the fulfilment of IP customary rights. Using a normative legal research method with legislative, conceptual, and policy analysis approaches, this study finds that legal mitigation of international market regulations is inadequate if it relies solely on a formal compliance approach within the Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) instrument and the National Dashboard system. Legal loopholes resulting from procedural obstacles to establishing MHA status in regions risk legalising land tenure that is legally flawed for the sake of meeting certification requirements. Harmonisation of the legal system requires the enactment of specific legislation (lex specialis) on MHA, the establishment of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) as an absolute prerequisite for business licensing, and the integration of indigenous territory mapping into the national geospatial database. This legal framework serves as a guarantee of domestic rights certainty whilst also functioning as a legitimate strategic diplomatic instrument in countering environmental protection justifications used as barriers to global trade.

Keywords:

Non-tariff barriers Economic sovereignty Indigenous communities International trade Free Prior and Informed Consent.

References

(AMAN), A. M. A. N. (n.d.). Petisi untuk Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 35. Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara (AMAN). http://www.aman.or.id/petisi-mk-35-bahasa-indonesia

(Ditjenbun), H. D. J. P. (n.d.). Pemerintah Indonesia Dorong Dashboard Komoditas Sebagai Alat Ketertelusuran yang Terintegrasi. Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia. https://ditjenbun.pertanian.go.id/pemerintah-indonesia-dorong-dashboard-komoditas-sebagai-alat-ketertelusuran-yang-terintegrasi/

(Humas), S. J. M. R. (n.d.). Bamsoet Desak Kementerian ATR Selesaikan Konflik Agraria di Deli Serdang. Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Republik Indonesia (MPR RI). https://mpr.go.id/berita/bamsoet-desak-kementerian-atr-selesaikan-konflik-agraria-di-deli-serdang

(nabilainass), N. I. (n.d.). Perkebunan Karet Sumatera dan Tantangan EUDR: Peluang di Tengah Isu Deforestasi. https://sumatranomics.com/artikel-blog/perkebunan-karet-sumatera-dan-tantangan-eudr-peluang-di-tengah-isu-deforestasi/

(RSPO), R. on S. P. O. (n.d.). RSPO Tegaskan Bahwa FPIC Tetap Menjadi Komponen Utama dalam Standar RSPO 2024. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), 24 Oktober 2024. https://rspo.org/id/rspo-menegaskan-kembali-bahwa-fpic-tetap-menjadi-komponen-utama-dalam-standar-rspo-2024/

Akbar, A. A., & Palupi, S. (n.d.). The EU’s New Deforestation Regulation Faces Significant Challenges in Indonesia. Fern (Fern.Org). https://www.fern.org/id/publications-insight/article/the-eus-new-deforestation-regulation-faces-significant-challenges-in-indonesia/

Alfian, A., Kudussisara, K., Maimunah, N. S., & Susana, I. (2025). Masyarakat Adat dan Toba PULP Lestari: Pemetaan Aktor dan Analisis Konflik Agraria. Aceh Anthropological Journal, 9(1), 53–69.

Arsika, I. M. B., & Ningsih, D. I. U. (2024). Mengarustamakan Pendekatan HAM Dalam Perlindungan Lingkungan Hidup di Asia Tenggara: Bagaimana AICHR Memainkan Peran? Simbur Cahaya, 345–367.

Bhawono, A. (n.d.). Dashboard Nasional Dinilai Akal-Akalan Pemerintah Patuhi EUDR. Betahita. https://betahita.id/news/detail/10807/dashboard-nasional-dinilai-akal-akalan-pemerintah-patuhi-eudr.html?v=1735265450

Camelia, A. I., & Sulaksana, I. W. T. (2012). Pelaksanaan Kedaulatan Negara Atas Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Melalui Mekanisme Persyaratan Perdagangan: Pelaksanaan Kedaulatan Negara Atas Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Melalui Mekanisme Persyaratan Perdagangan. YURIDIKA.

Demadevina, N. (n.d.). Opini Hukum April 2020: Perpres 44/2020 tentang Sistem Sertifikasi Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Berkelanjutan Indonesia. https://web.huma.or.id/app/uploads/2020/06/Opini-Hukum-Perpres-44-2020.pdf

Djajaatmadja, B. I. (2005). Laporan Akhir Penyusunan Kerangka Ilmiah Perencanaan Pembangunan Hukum tentang Harmonisasi Hukum Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Kelautan dalam Kerangka Desentralisasi.

Hartanto, A. (n.d.). Measuring the Impact of the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) on Indonesia’s Palm Oil Sector.

Hasanah, U., Basarah, B., & Lofi, R. M. (2024). Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012 Terhadap Eksistensi Masyarakat Adat Di Kabupaten Kampar. JATISWARA, 39(1), 110–120.

Hukum, D., Internasional, P., & Proteksionisme, E. (2025). VISA : Journal of Visions and Ideas VISA : Journal of Visions and Ideas. VISA: Journal of Visions and Ideas, 5(2), 1379–1390. https://doi.org/47467/visa.v5i2.9539

Indonesia, P. S. (n.d.). HCV, FPIC, dan Peran Masyarakat Adat dalam Sertifikasi Keberlanjutan RSPO, ISCC, dan FSC. Peterson Solutions Indonesia. https://www.petersonindonesia.com/id/post/hcv-fpic-dan-peran-masyarakat-adat-dalam-sertifikasi-keberlanjutan-rspo-iscc-dan-fsc

Jamrudin, H., & Widowaty, Y. (2026). Penguatan Prinsip Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) dalam Perlindungan Hak Tanah Masyarakat Adat. Bina Hukum Lingkungan, 10(2), 249–266.

Jong, H. N. (n.d.). Indonesia, EU reconcile forest data ahead of new rules on deforestation-free trade. Mongabay. https://news.mongabay.com/2024/08/indonesia-eu-reconcile-forest-data-ahead-of-new-rules-on-deforestation-free-trade/

Kamim, A. B. M., & Abrar, M. I. (2020). Bagaimana Sertifikasi Kelapa Sawit Berkelanjutan Gagal Mencegah Perusahaan Anggota RSPO dan ISPO Merampas Tanah Adat di Indonesia? BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 6(2), 145–157.

Karlina, W. R., Sari, I. K., Rampengan, F. D., & Saputra, R. D. (2021). Penerapan Regulasi Barrier To Trade Terkait Perlindungan Public Health Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. Al-Qisthu: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum, 19(1), 84–105.

Koalisi 44 Organisasi Masyarakat Sipil Indonesia (antara lain: AMAN, FWI, Kaoem Telapak, Sawit Watch, SPKS, WALHI, dan lain-lain). (n.d.). Respon CSOs Indonesia terhadap Kesepakatan Final Regulasi Bebas Deforestasi Uni Eropa (The Response of Indonesian Civil Society in Regards to the Agreed EUDR). https://kaoemtelapak.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Respon-CSOs-Indonesia-terhadap-Kesepakatan-EUDR.pdf

Maharani, D. (2025). EU deforestation regulation and palm oil: environmental protection or non-tariff barrier? Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan, 10(2), 112–154.

Maryam, S. (2025). PEMBENTUKAN AD HOC JOINT TASK FORCE INDONESIA–MALAYSIA–UNI EROPA SEBAGAI RESPON ATAS KEBIJAKAN EUROPEAN UNION DEFORESTATION REGULATION. Universitas Satya Negara Indonesia.

Nasution, A. R., Fikri, R. A., Fatmawati, I., & Perangin-Angin, M. E. (2025). Conflicts Between Environmental and Trade Norms: A Legal Analysis of the Application of the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) to Indonesian Palm Oil Exports Based on the GATT-WTO Legal Framework. International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects), 6(1), 308–317.

Norway, R. F. (2025). Indonesia: EUDR Risk Benchmarking Country Profile. https://www.regnskog.no/uploads/documents/EUDR-Risk-Benchmarking-Indonesia.pdf

Oil, K.-S. of M. and I. P.-E. F. I. (2025). Petani Adat Komoditas Kelapa Sawit di Kawasan Hutan Indonesia dan Peraturan Deforestasi Uni Eropa (Policy Brief). https://efi.int/sites/default/files/files/flegtredd/KAMI/Resources/Indigenous_oil_palm_BI.pdf

Rahman, F. (n.d.). Peranan Masyarakat Adat dalam Konservasi Lingkungan. Pusat Studi Lingkungan Hidup (PSLH) Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://pslh.ugm.ac.id/peranan-masyarakat-adat-dalam-konservasi-lingkungan/

Rambe, M. J. (2025). Conditional Recognition: The Juridical Gap Between Normative Rights and Implementation Reality for “Indigenous Peoples” in Indonesia. International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects), 6(1), 249–257.

Reboah, C., Mbaididje, H., & Daldeniz, B. (n.d.). Overview of Impact of the EUDR on RSPO Independent Smallholders: GAP & Impact Analysis (Final Version).

Revianti, N. (n.d.). Menuntut Pengakuan Masyarakat Adat sebagai Aktor Utama Konservasi Keanekaragaman Hayati dalam Skema UN CBD. https://www.huma.or.id/en/isu-strategis/menuntut-pengakuan-masyarakat-adat-sebagai-aktor-utama-konservasi-keanekaragaman-hayati-dalam-skema-un-cbd

Tehupeiory, A. (2021). Monograf Pengakuan & Perlindungan Hak-Hak Masyarakat Adat. UKI Press.

Author Biographies

Abdul Razak Nasution, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

Author Origin : Indonesia

Muhammad Juang Rambe, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

Author Origin : Indonesia

Rahul Ardian Fikri, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Abdul Razak Nasution, Muhammad Juang Rambe, & Rahul Ardian Fikri. (2025). HARMONISING NATIONAL ECONOMIC SOVEREIGNTY AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE STANDARDS THROUGH THE RECOGNITION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES TO NATURAL RESOURCES. Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI), 5(1), 4474–4483. Retrieved from https://radjapublika.com/index.php/MORFAI/article/view/5385

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.