Abstract
Study This analyze in a way normative arrangement law about management goods evidence and assets results crime in regulation applicable laws and regulations as well as evaluate its suitability with principle certainty law . The study was conducted through study law normative with approach legislation and conceptual , using material primary law in the form of the Criminal Procedure Code and laws sectoral related ( including the Corruption Eradication Law , the Money Laundering Law, and the Narcotics Law ), as well as material law secondary in the form of literature and articles scientific . Research results show that arrangement management goods evidence and assets results crime has provide base legality action confiscation , storage , return and seizure , including protection to party third party in good faith good . However , the settings are spread out in a number of regime law show trend potential fragmentation of norms cause difference interpretation and application . In perspective theory certainty law , condition the confirm the need harmonization and strengthening integration arrangements so that norms are more consistent , easy predicted, as well as give clear guidelines for enforcer law and parties interested .
Keywords:
Legal Certainty Evidence Confiscation Assets Proceedings of Crime Asset ConfiscationReferences
Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, ed. revisi (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019), 143–147 Gustav Radbruch, Legal Philosophy, trans. Kurt Wilk (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1950), 107–110.
Gustav Radbruch, Legal Philosophy, trans. Kurt Wilk (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1950), 107–110.
Hans Kelsen, Pure Theory of Law, trans. Max Knight (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967), 193–198.
Johnny Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2006), 295–303
Lon L. Fuller, The Morality of Law, rev. ed. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969), 33–39.
M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, ed. kedua (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016), 224–231
M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, ed.
kedua (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016), 224–231.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, ed. revisi (Jakarta: Kencana, 2017), 35–41
Philipus M. Hadjon, Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat di Indonesia (Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1987), 72–75.
Rahmi Dwi Sutanti, Pujiyono Pujiyono, dan Nur Rochaeti, “The Urgency of Implementing Non-
Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture in Combating Green Financial Crimes in Indonesia,” EAI Endorsed Transactions on Governance and Regulation 2, no. 8 (2023), https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-7-2022.2326300.
Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014), 53–60.
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2001), 12–15.
Tantimin Tantimin, “Penyitaan Hasil Korupsi Melalui Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture sebagai
Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara,” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 5, no. 1 (2023): 85– 102, https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i1.85-102
Utrecht, Pengantar dalam Hukum Indonesia (Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru, 1989), 29–31.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amellia Dhini Pangestu, Rizki Setyobowo Sangalang, Claudia Yuni Pramita, Yurika Fahliany Dewi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
