"THE URGENCY OF HORIZONTAL SUPERVISION (JUDICIAL SCRUTINY) OF LEGAL AID IN PRE-TRIAL AS PART OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF SUSPECTS"
Main Article Content
Joshua Aditya Setyanugraha
Muktiono
Abdul Madjid
This study examines the urgency of horizontal supervision (judicial scrutiny) of legal aid in pre-trial. Legal aid is a principle contained in the due process of law. The research method used in this study is normative research with a conceptual approach and a case approach. Horizontal supervision in the current pre-trial concept does not include legal aid as an object of judge's authority so that for suspects who are not accompanied by legal counsel as required by Article 56 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the assessment must be submitted to the trial examination. Furthermore, how should horizontal supervision of legal aid provide human rights guarantees to suspects? Horizontal supervision carried out by pre-trial judges or in the future through the concept of Preliminary Examining Judges, it is appropriate to provide a balance between the great power of the apparatus administering the pre-trial function, with the human rights of suspects, including legal aid which is a universal right, so that due process of law can be achieved.
Book
I. G. A. B., Wiranata. 2005. Hak Asasi (Anak) Dalam Realita, Qua Vadis, dalam Muladi: Hak Asasi Manusia, Hakekat, Konsep dan Implikasinya dalam Perspektif Hukum dan Masyarakat. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Kristianto, et all. 2009. Pedoman Bantuan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Lovina dan Sustira Dirga. 2022. Judicial Scrunity melalui Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan dalam RKUHAP, Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR).
Luthan, Salman, et all. 2014. Praperadilan di Indonesia: Teori, Sejarah, dan Praktiknya, Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform.
Maroni. 2018. Wajah Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Peradilan Pidana, Lampung: Anugrah Utama Raharja.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2017. Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana.
Sugiharto. 2012. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Semarang: Unissula Press.
Tobias March Weber R. David Peterson. 1996. Pre-Trial Criminal Procedure, A Survey of Constitutional Rights. Charles C. Thomas. Springfield Illinois.
Journal
Cohen, David (ed.), Interpretations of Article 156a of the Indonesian Criminal Code on Blasphemy and Religious Defamation (A Legal and Human Rights Analysis), Jakarta: Indonesian Institute the Independent Judiciary, Lembaga Kajian dan Advokasi Independensi Peradilan (LeIP), Agustus 2018.
Hamzah, Andi. Hubungan antara Penyidik dan Penuntut Umum dalam RKUHAP, Media Hukum dan Keadilan Teropong, 2014.
Hikmawati, Puteri. Eksistensi Hakim Komisaris Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Analisis Terhadap RUU Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana), Jurnal Kajian Vol 18, No 1 (2013), Pusat Pengkajian, Pengelolaan data, dan Informasi Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI, Jakarta, Maret 2013.
Plangiten, Maesa. Fungsi Dan Wewenang Lembaga Praperadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia, Lex Crimen, Vol. II, No. 6 2013.
Wulandari, Widati dan Tristam Pascal Moeliono, Anotasi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 665K/PID/2014, Dictum Jurnal Kajian Putusan Pengadilan Edisi 16, Desember 2024.
LAIN-LAIN
Rancangan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia tentang Hukum Acara Pidana Draft 11 Desember Tahun 2012.
Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention and Imprisonment atau Kumpulan Prinsip-Prinsip tentang Perlindungan Semua Orang dalam Segala Bentuk Penahanan atau Pemenjaraan tahun 1988.
Putusan Sela Nomor 43/Pid.Sus/2019/Pn.Yyk
Putusan Nomor 60/Pid.Pra/2019/PN.Mdn
Putusan Nomor 63/Pid/2019/PT JAP
