Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE RESOLUTION OF THE PEACE AGREEMENT IN THE PKPU AND BANKRUPTCY CASE OF SRITEX

Authors

Heru Herdian Herawan

DOI:

10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4945

Published:

2026-01-10

Downloads

Abstract

PT Sri Rejeki Isman Tbk (Sritex) entered a suspension of debt payment obligations (PKPU) in May 2021 with liabilities of approximately IDR 12.9 trillion and obtained a court-approved settlement (homologation) in January 2022. However, the company failed to fulfill its post-homologation obligations, leading the Semarang Commercial Court to revoke the homologation and declare Sritex bankrupt in October 2024, a decision that subsequently became final and binding after the Supreme Court rejected the cassation appeal. The bankruptcy affected the administration of assets by the curator, the rights of creditors and subsidiaries, and raised legal issues concerning the validity of the homologation revocation, the protection of the parties, and the application of the principles of good faith and proportionality. The objectives of this research are, first, to examine the legal consequences of the revocation of the settlement agreement in the PKPU and bankruptcy proceedings of PT Sri Rejeki Isman Tbk (Sritex); and second, to analyze and determine the legal implications of Decision No. 12/Pdt.Sus.PKPU/2021/PN.Smg in conjunction with Supreme Court Decision No. 556 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024, Decision No. 2/Pdt.Sus-Homologasi/2024/PN Niaga Smg in conjunction with Supreme Court Decision No. 1345 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024, for Sritex’s creditors. This study employs normative legal research. The findings indicate that the revocation of a settlement agreement (homologation) within the PKPU and bankruptcy mechanism constitutes a legal instrument to protect creditors when the debtor fails to perform its obligations, as regulated under Law Number 37 of 2004, which allows the debtor to be directly declared bankrupt. In the case of PT Sri Rejeki Isman Tbk (Sritex), the revocation of homologation signifies a shift from debt restructuring to bankruptcy in the collective interest of creditors, in line with Thomas H. Jackson’s Creditor Protection Theory and John Rawls’s principles of justice and proportionality. From the perspective of law and economics and the values of Pancasila, this measure functions as a corrective mechanism to prevent inefficiency and uncertainty, while ensuring a fair, proportionate, and sustainable distribution of assets in accordance with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Keywords:

Annulment of Homologation Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations Bankruptcy of PT Sri Rejeki Isman Tbk (Sritex).

References

Annisa Nabila Hasan dan Ken Paramitha Aryana, “Konsepsi Corporate Social Responsibility Pada Peraturan Menteri BUMN tentang Program Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan”, Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Humaniora Indonesia: Vol. 4(1) Juli 2024.

Jackson, Thomas H. (1986), The Logic and Limits of Bankruptcy Law, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Jason Jeremy et.al., “Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Terhadap Debitor Pailit dalam Peer to Peer Lending”, Jurnal UNES Law Review: Vol.6(3) Maret 2024.

Muhammad Ridduan, “Analisis Yuridis atas Kedudukan Kreditur Pemegang Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Dalam Proses Kepailitan”, Lex Lata Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum; Vol 3(3) November 2021.

Nasution, Bahder Johan, Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2008.

Posner, Richard A, Economic Analysis of Law,: Aspen Publishers, New York, 2014.

Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1971.

Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy, Hukum Kepailitan: Memahami Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004, Pustaka Utama Grafiti, Jakarta, 2010.

Subhan, Hadi, Hukum Kepailitan: Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan, Kencana, Jakarta, 2008.

Tjokorda Agung Candra Aditya, “Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Pembatalan Perjanjian Perdamaian yang telah Dihomologasi Karena Bertentangan dengan Ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayarn Utang (PKPU)”, Dharmasisya Jurnal Program Magister Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia: Vol.1(3) September 2021.

Author Biography

Heru Herdian Herawan, Universitas Pancasila

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Heru Herdian Herawan. (2026). LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE RESOLUTION OF THE PEACE AGREEMENT IN THE PKPU AND BANKRUPTCY CASE OF SRITEX. International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS), 5(6), 380–385. https://doi.org/10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4945

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.