Legal Protection of Workers in Employment Termination Disputes in North Sumatra: Between Legal Certainty and Social Justice
DOI:
10.5281/zenodo.21355152Published:
2025-07-30Downloads
Abstract
This study analyzes the legal protection of workers in employment termination disputes in North Sumatra by examining the relationship between legal certainty and social justice. Employment termination remains a critical labour issue because it affects workers’ economic security, access to welfare, and bargaining position in industrial relations. Although Indonesian labour law provides formal protection through termination procedures, severance rights, compensation mechanisms, and industrial relations dispute settlement, practical barriers continue to limit workers’ access to substantive justice. This study applies a socio-legal approach by examining statutory regulations, relevant legal documents, court-related materials, and the practical context of employment termination disputes in North Sumatra. The findings show that legal protection is formally available through Law No. 13 of 2003, Law No. 2 of 2004, Law No. 6 of 2023, and Government Regulation No. 35 of 2021. However, workers still face unequal bargaining power, limited legal knowledge, financial constraints, lengthy dispute resolution processes, and difficulties in enforcing their rights. Employment termination disputes in North Sumatra commonly involve the legality of termination, procedural compliance, severance pay, compensation rights, and access to dispute resolution mechanisms. The study concludes that effective worker protection cannot rely solely on formal legal certainty, but must also incorporate social justice through accessible, fair, and responsive dispute resolution. This article contributes to labour law scholarship by offering a regional socio-legal analysis that integrates legal certainty and social justice in employment termination disputes.
Keywords:
Employment termination industrial relations dispute legal certainty social justice worker protection.References
Arrasyiid, M. R., & Rasji. (2026). Analysis of unilateral termination of employment without the establishment of an industrial relations dispute resolution institution in a force majeure situation: Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 374 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2023. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v21i1.1403
Baskoro, S. H., & Nugroho, A. (2024). Analysis of termination of employment due to violation of collective labor agreement: Case study of Decision Number 1326 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2023. Indonesian Journal of Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 1(2), 44–70. https://doi.org/10.26740/ijllir.v1i02.36331
Bhara, W. S., & Shariffuddin, N. D. B. (2024). Juridical analysis of the judge’s decision on premature lawsuit in the settlement of termination of employment problems: Case study of Judge’s Decision Number 1228 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2023. Indonesian Journal of Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 1(2), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.26740/ijllir.v1i02.36383
Fathammubina, R., & Apriani, R. (2018). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pemutusan hubungan kerja sepihak bagi pekerja. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.35706/dejure.v3i1.1889
Lingga, E., & Siregar, H. (2025). Termination of employment without an official letter: A juridical review of employee protection under the Manpower Act and the Job Creation Act. Priviet Social Sciences Journal, 5(11). https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i11.1018
Mirdinata, A. J., Budiono, A. R., Santoso, B., & Dewi, A. S. K. (2026). Meaning of unlawful and unjust termination of employment in labor law: A perspective from international law and national law. International Journal on Language, Research and Education Studies, 10(1).
Ndun, I., Helan, Y. G. T., & Pekuwali, U. L. (2020). The absolute competence of the Industrial Relations Court in resolving employment termination disputes. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 5(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i1.33159
Rahmawati, A. D. (2024). Analysis of the Supreme Court decision on the calculation of compensation based on the reason for termination of employment: Case study of Supreme Court Decision Number 131 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2024. Indonesian Journal of Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 1(2), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.26740/ijllir.v1i02.36385
Sihombing, B. F. (2024). Industrial relations dispute resolution model in Indonesia. Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research.
Sinaga, M. M. M., Nu’man, H., Yusdiansyah, E., & Heniarti, D. D. (2025). Application of the non-retroactive principle by judges in disputes regarding termination of employment relations after the eligibility of the Job Creation Law as a manifestation of legal certainty. MORFAI Journal, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.54443/morfai.v5i3.2870
Sudiarawan, K. A., Yasa, P. G. A. S., Kasih, D. P. D., Dananjaya, N. S., & Damayanti, N. K. D. (2024). Formulation of online dispute resolution in realizing fair industrial relations dispute settlement: A comparative study. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i2.1308
Syahiruddin, Ramadhan, C., & Ramadhan, C. (2023). Legal protection against unilateral termination of employment by companies in Indonesia. International Journal of Research and Review, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230568
Wibowo, R. F., & Herawati, R. (2021). Perlindungan bagi pekerja atas tindakan pemutusan hubungan kerja secara sepihak. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.109-120
Government of Indonesia. (2004). Law Number 2 of 2004 concerning the Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes.
Government of Indonesia. (2023). Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation into Law.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rika Jamin Marbun, Rahmayanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
