LOYALTY PERSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF SMALL AND MEDIUM BUSINESS MARKETING ABILITY TO INNOVATE AND PERFORM GOOD
DOI:
10.54443/ijerlas.v3i4.988Published:
2023-06-24Downloads
Abstract
The production environment has changed to a knowledge and technology system. Competition in the marketing system has also evolved into a more global and innovation system, becoming a competitive environment in most countries and businesses. Companies must evolve and innovate to deal with intense competition and shifting consumer demands if they hope to succeed in the long term in today's global market economy. Small and medium-sized enterprises must seek new motivations and business strategies to better develop new goods and services and take into account new information and technological advances. For businesses to grow, innovation is essential. Traditional innovation literature, first published in 1934, focuses on the factory sector, competitive markets and developed economies. Compared to other countries, Indonesia has a much higher proportion of small businesses per capita. Over the years, SMEs have contributed to developing countries in Asia (including ASEAN). Small and medium-sized enterprises are cited in ASEAN countries as a key driver of economic growth and development, the foundation of national economies, the highest-paying industry, and a potential tool for poverty reduction. Especially after the Asian financial crisis, including Indonesia.Keywords:
Loyalty, Business Marketing, InnovationsReferences
Adams, G. dan Hall, G. 1993. Influences on Growth of SMEs: An International Comparison. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development International Journal, Vol.5, No.1, pp.73-84.
Aharoni, Y. 1994. How Small Firms Can Achieve Competitive Advantages in an Interdependent World, in T. Agmon and R. Drobbnick (eds.. Small Firms in Global Competition,N.Y.:Oxford University Press.
Al-Abd, Y, Mezher, T dan Al-Saleh, Y 2012. Toward Building a National Innovation System in UAE. paper presented at the Technology Management for Emerging Technologies (PICMET) Conference, British Columbia, 29 July.
Ali, A. Ciftci, M. dan Cready, W. 2008. Does the Market Underestimate the Implications Of Changes in R&D investment for Future Earnings?. Working Paper, University of Texas at Dallas and SUNY at Binghamton.
Allocca, M.A. dan Kessler, E.H. 2006. Innovation Speed in Small and MediumSized Enterprises. Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol.15, No.3, pp.279-295.
Aragon-Sanchez, A. dan Sanchez-Marin, G. 2005. Strategic Orientation, Management Characteristics, and Performance: A Study of Spanish SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, Vol.43, No.3, pp.287-308.
Avci, U. Madanoglu, M. dan Okumus, F. 2011. Strategic Orientation and Performance of Tourism Firms: Evidence from a Developing Country. Tourism Management, Vol.32, pp.147-157.
Bacon, N. Ackers, P. Story, J. dan Coates, D. 1996. It’s a Small World: Managing Human Resources in Small Businesses. International Journal of Human Resources Management, Vol.7, No.1, pp.82-100.
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). 2015. Jumlah Usaha Kecil, Menengah dan Besar Menurut Sektor Ekonomi Tahun 2012 - 2015, Badan Pusat Statistik. Retrieved April 19, 2016, from http://www.bps.go.id Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). 2016. Sensus Ekonomi Tahun 2016, Badan Pusat Statistik. Retrieved November 29, 2016 from http://www.bps.go.id Bank Indonesia; http://infoukm.wordpress.com
Barclay, D, Higgins, C dan Thompson, R. 1995. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration. Technology Studies, vol.2, no.2, pp.285-309.
Beinhocker, E.D. 1997. Strategy at the Edge of Chaos. McKinsey Quarterly, No.1, pp.24-39. Bijmolt,T. dan P.S.Zwart. 1994. The Impact of Internal Factors on Export Success of Dutch Small and Medium-Sized Firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 32(2). Blumentritt, T. dan Danis, W. 2006. Business Strategy Types and Innovative Practices. Journal of Management Issues, Vol.18, No.2, pp.274-291.
Bougrain, F dan Haudeville, B. 2002. Innovation, Collaboration, and SMEs Internal Research Capacities. Research Policy, vol.31, no.5, pp.735-747.
Brem, A. and Voigt, K-I. 2009. Integration of Market Pull and Technology Push in the Corporate Front End and Innovation Management-Insights from the German Software Industry. Technovation, Vol.29, No.5, pp.351-367.
Byrne, BM. 2001. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, vol.1, no.1, pp.55-86.
Cefis, E. dan Marsili, O. 2005. A Matter of Life and Death: Innovation and Firm Survival. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.14, No.6, pp.1167-1192.
Chan, C dan Makico, S. 2004. Legitimacy and Multi-Level Institutional Environments: Implications For Foreign Subsidiary Ownership Structure. Journal of International Business Studies, vol.38, no.4, pp.621-638.
Chirico, F. dan Salvato, C. 2008. Knowledge Integration and Dynamic Organizational Adaptation in Family Firms. Family Business Review, Vol.21, No.2, pp.169-181.
Cooke, P, Uranga, M dan Etxebarria, G. 1997. Regional Innovation Systems: Institutional and Organizational Dimensions. Research Policy, vol.26, no.4/5, pp.475-491.
Damanpour, F, Szabat, K dan Evan, W. 1989. The Relationship Between Types of Innovation and Organizational Performance. Journal of Management Studies, vol.26, no.6, pp.587- 601.
Davila, T. Epstein, M. dan Shelton, R. 2006. Making Innovation Work: How to Manage it, Measure it, and Profit From it, Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River.
Deshpande, R, Farley, J dan Webster, F. 1993. Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A quadrate Analysis. Journal of Marketing, vol.57, no.1, pp.2357.
Dharmanegara, I.B.A. Sitiari, N.W. dan Wirayudha, D.G.N. 2016. Job Competency and Work Environment: the Effect on Job Satisfaction and Job Performance Among SMEs Worker. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM). Vol. 18, Issue 1.Ver. II (Jan. 2016. PP 19- 26. DOI: 10.9790/487X-18121926
Di Maggio, PI dan Powell, WW. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited - Instructional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, vol.48, no.2, pp.147160.
Dougherty, D. dan Hardy, C. 1996. Sustained Product Innovation in Large, Mature Organizations: Overcoming Innovation-ToOrganization Problems. Academy of Management Journal, Vol.39, pp.1120-1153.
Nasution, D. A. D., Barus, M. D. B., & Tasril, V. (2020). Peningkatan Daya Saing Bumdes untuk Pengembangan Ekonomi Desa Pematang Serai di Kecamatan Tanjung Pura Kabupaten Langkat. JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri), 4(3), 319-329.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Finta Aramita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
