INCONSISTENCY IN THE PROVISION OF RESTITUTION FOR VICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE CRIMES IN LIGHT OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN INDONESIA
DOI:
10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2816Published:
2025-05-02Downloads
Abstract
Indonesia, as a state governed by the rule of law, is committed to protecting human rights through the Criminal Justice System. One of the main challenges is the handling of sexual violence crimes. To this end, Law No. 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes (UU TPKS) affirms the right to restitution for victims as part of their recovery. However, implementation in practice shows differences in judicial considerations and attitudes in determining restitution, despite its clear regulation in the law. This study aims to analyze the factors hindering the implementation of restitution for victims of sexual violence crimes, with a focus on cases carrying penalties exceeding four years. This research is expected to provide recommendations to enhance law enforcement compliance in fulfilling the obligation to provide restitution, thereby better protecting victims’ rights.
Keywords:
Sexual Violence, Restitution, ImplementationReferences
Noviani P et al., 2018, Mengatasi Dan Mencegah Tindak Kekerasan Seksual Pada Perempuan Dengan Pelatihan Asertif, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jawa Barat
Amiruddin, H. Zainal Asikin, 2020, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT RadjaGrafindo Persada, Depok
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2016, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta
Rena Yulia, 2013, Viktimologi Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Kejahatan, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta
Rosania Paradiaz dan Eko Soponyono, Perlindungan hukum Terhadap Korban Pelecehan Seksual. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2022
Sabri, Fadillah, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Dengan Restitusi Terhadap Anak Yang Menjadi Korban Tindak Pidana’, UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2023
Sri Dewi Rahayu, “Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” PAMPAS: Journal Of Criminal Law Vol. 1, No. 1, 2020
Livia Musfika Santi, Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Disparitas Pidana dalam Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana. Verstek Jurnal Hukum Acara. Vol.7, No. 2, 2021
Frengky Manurung, Alvi Syahrin, Madiasa Ablisar dan Sunarmi, Disparitas Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Rantauprapat (Studi Kasus Putusan No.: 159/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Rap dan Putusan No.: 626/PID.SUS/2020/PN. RAP), Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian, Law Jurnal, Vol. II No. 1, 2021
Nimerodi Gulo & Ade Kurniawan M, “Disparitas dalam Penjatuhan Pidana”. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol. 47, No. 3, 2018
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Permohonan dan Pemberian Restitusi dan Kompensasi kepada Korban Tindak Pidana
License
Copyright (c) 2025 David Mangaraja Lumban Batu, Setiawan Noerdajasakti, Faizin Sulistio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
