REFORMULATION OF GREEN VICTIMOLOGY ARRANGEMENTS IN THE LAW OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT THAT BETTER GUARANTEES LEGAL PROTECTION FOR THE ENVIRONMENT
DOI:
10.54443/ijerlas.v5i4.3763Published:
2025-07-31Downloads
Abstract
This research is motivated by Law Number 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, which, in fact, remains limited accommodating the concept of green victimology in the regulation and handling of environmental crimes. Given the prevalence of environmental crimes whose perpetrators are not punished proportionately to the human and non-human losses caused, it is important to question the legal implications of applying the concept of green victimology to the legal protection of environmental victims in the Environmental Protection and Management Law and the regulation of green victimology in the Environmental Protection and Management Law that Better Ensures Legal Protection for the Environment. The type of research used by the author is normative legal research with an explanatory nature. Legal materials for analysis were obtained from primary legal sources in the form of criminal and environmental laws, as well as secondary legal materials from literature on environmental crime and green victimology. The research was conducted through literature review, using a legal and comparative approach, and analyzed qualitatively. The legal implications of applying green victimology in the Environmental Protection and Management Law (UUPPLH) encourage reforms in the definition of victims, the right to sue, recovery mechanisms, as well as sanctions and law enforcement that are more comprehensive and ecological justice. the regulation of Green victimology in the UUPPLH to ensure legal protection for the environment can begin with the reconstruction/reformulation of the UUPPLH by expanding the definition of victims to include the environment as a victim with the right to protection and selected as a subject of environmental law enforcement, up to expanding the definition of victims by including the environment as a victim with the right to protection and selected as a subject of environmental law enforcement.
Keywords:
Green Victimology, UUPPLH, Legal Protection, VictimsReferences
Kahfi, A. (2014). Kejahatan Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Hukum Pidana & Ketatanegaraan, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 206-2016
Sebanyak 908 Kasus Kejahatan Lingkungan Ditangani Sepanjang 2023, dikutip dari https://www.kompas.id/baca/humaniora/2023/12/28 pada tanggal 15 Februari 2025.
Menelisik Data Kasus Pidana Lingkungan Hidup di Tingkat Kasasi Periode 2020-2023, dikutip dari https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/ pada tanggal 15 Februari 2025.
Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar. (2024). Pelaku Kejahatan Lingkungan: Jenis, Motivasi, dan Penyelesaian. Proceedings Conference, National Conference on Law Studies (NCLOS). Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran”.
Salim A., Utami, R.A., Fernando, Z.J. (2022). Green victimology: Sebuah Konsep Perlindungan Korban dan Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan di Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 59-79.
White, R. (2010). Global Environmental Harm: Criminological Perspectives. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
White, R. (2018) Green victimology and Non-Human Victim. International Review of Victimology. Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 1-10.
Wilson D., Ross S. (2015). Crime, Victims and Policy: Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mutiara, A. 2022. Upaya Penegakan Hukum dan Perlindungan Korban Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup Ditinjau dari Sudut Pandang Green Victimology. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Tata Ruang dan Agraria. Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 130-146.
Nurwanty, I.I., Santoso, W.Y. (2022). Green Victimology di Jerman: Kajian Pembelajaran bagi Indonesia. Tesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Kusuma, D.P.R.W., Pulungan, M.M. (2024). Criminal Penalties for Wildlife Trafficking: A Green victimology Perspective. Contemporary Issues in Criminal Law. Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 81-106.
Angkasa. (2020). Green victimology Perspective in the Law Number 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management. Jurnal Media Hukum. Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 228-239.
Potter, G. (2010). What is Green Criminology? New Jersey: Sociology Review.
Meta, K. (2015). Perspektif Historis dan Perbandingan Pengaturan Masalah Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum. Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 67-76.
DPRD Jawa Tengah. (2022). Buku I Naskah Akademik tentang Pengendalian Lingkungan Hidup di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Semarang: Komisi D DPRD Jawa Tengah.
Yulia, R. (2010). Viktimologi: Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Hasbi, et al. (2019). Kajian Sosiologis tentang Masalah Lingkungan Sungai Tallo dan Sungai Jeneberang di Kota Makassar. TALENTA Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts. Series 2, pp. 143-149.
Alisjahbana, A.S., Murningtyas, E. (2018). Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia (Konsep, Target dan Strategi Implementasi). Bandung: Unpad Press.
Andin, I.W., et al. (2024). Eksistensi Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan dalam Mewujudkan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial. Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 294-308.
Hamdani S Rukiah, Jerman: Pemimpin Lingkungan dalam Keberlanjutan Global, 2024, diakses melalui https://mulamula.id/jerman-pemimpin-lingkungan-dalam-keberlanjutan-global/ pada tanggal 9 Juli 2025.
European Union Action to Fight Environmental Crime. (2014). Fighting Environmental Crime in Germany: A Country Report. Berlin: Ecologic Institute.
Kauffman, C.M., Martin, P. (2018). Constructing Rights of Nature Norms in the US, Ecuador, and New Zealand. Journal of Global Environment Politics. Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 43-62.
Mika, J.P., Scheyvens, R. (2022). Te Awa Tupua: Peace, Justice and Sustainability Through Indigenous Tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. Vol. 30, No. 2-3, pp. 637-657.
Sari, I. (2018). Sengketa Lingkungan Hidup dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata Lingkungan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara. Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 14-35.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ummu Salamah, Prija Djatmika, I Nyoman Nurjaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
