THE AUTHORITY OF JUDGES IN GOVERNING THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE IN INDONESIA’S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
DOI:
10.54443/ijerlas.v5i5.4010Published:
2025-09-13Downloads
Abstract
The doctrine of criminal evidence, encapsulated in the maxim in criminalibus probationes debent esse luce clariores, establishes that the evidence presented in criminal proceedings should be as transparent as light. This requirement entails that evidence—both in its formal dimension and in its material substance—must be subject to rigorous testing concerning the legality and authenticity of its acquisition. Nevertheless, the evidentiary process frequently encounters problems in both formal and material respects. Judicial scrutiny of evidentiary quality and admissibility includes, among others, examining whether documentary evidence was obtained through unlawful means or produced under circumstances that undermine its validity. Employing a normative juridical research method, this study investigates the judicial application of the Exclusionary Rules of Evidence in Indonesia’s criminal justice system through statutory and conceptual approaches.
Keywords:
Exclusionary Rules Evidence, Judges.References
Books
Abdulkadir Muhammad, 2004, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Ahmad Ubbe, 2008, Hukum Adat Kesusilaan Malaweng, Kesinambungan dan Perubahannya, Jakarta: Yasrif Watampone.
Andi Hamzah, 2000, Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia, PT Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Aria Zurnetti dkk, 2021, Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Depok.
Eddy O.S. Hiariej, 2012, Teori & Hukum Pembuktian (Cetakan Pertama), Erlangga: Jakarta.
Hari Sasangka dan Lily Rosita, 2003, Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Pidana, Mandar Maju, Bandung.
Herbert Packer, 1968, the Limits of the Criminal Sanction, Standford University Press, Stanford.
Jerome Skolnick, 1975, Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society 2nd Edition, John and Sons, New York
Muhammad Prodjohamidjojo, 1981, Tanya Jawab KUHAP (UU Nomor 8 Tahun 1981), Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Paul Roberts and Adrian Zuckerman, 2022, Criminal Evidence Third Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2006, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta
Saanin Basri, 1983, Psikiater dan Pengadilan Psikiatri Forensik Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Journal and Other Research
Adam Ilyas, 2021, Praktik Penerapan Exclusionary Rules di Indonesia, Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Jilid 50, No. 1
Amadeus Anugrah Dharmawan dan Bambang Santoso, 2023, Kesesuaian Alat Bukti Petunjuk Pada Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pornografi melalui Media Elektronik, Verstek, Vol. 11, Issue. 4.
Febryan Alam Susatyo dan Muchlas Rastra Samara, 2024, Constructing the Concept of Commissioner Judge in Enforcing the Exclusionary Rules Princiiple in Indonesia, Justisi Journal of Law, Vol. 10, Issue. 3.
Hasan Basri, 2020, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, SIGn Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 2 No. 2.
Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Tahun 2024.
Matthew D. Kim, 2023, The Exclusionary Rule and Judicial Integrity: An Empirical Study of Public Perceptions of the Exclusionary Rule, Missouri Law Review, Vol. 87, Issue 4.
Margaret K. Lewis, 2011, Controlling Abuse to Maintain Control: The Exclusionary Rule in China, International Law and Politics, Vol. 43, No. 629
Raed S. A. Faqir, 2024, The Exclusionary Rule of AI-Enhanced Digital Evidence in The United States And UEA: Comparative Analysis, Vol. 59, No.1
Randy E Barnett, Resolving the Dilemma of the Exclusionary Rule: An Application of Restitutive Principles of Justice, 32 Emory L‟ (1983) 32 Emory Law Journal 937.
Siyuan Chen, 2012, The Judicial Discretion to Exclude Relevant Evidence: Perspectives from an Indian Evidence Act Jurisdiction, International Journal of Evidence and Proof, Vol. 16, No. 4
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Matius Evan Anggara, Prija Djatmika, Yuliati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
