Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): September
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

THE ENFORCEMENT OF FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDGMENTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN INDONESIA AND JAPAN

Authors

David Boy Sumurung Silaban , Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara , Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo

DOI:

10.54443/ijerlas.v5i5.3867

Published:

2025-08-31

Downloads

Abstract

The principle of fair law enforcement is a manifestation of the state adhering to the conception of the rule of law (rechtsstaat) as the ideal of the nation. This makes the Indonesian judiciary have an important role and the principles of simplicity, quick and low cost as mandated by the 1945 Constitution and Act no 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Enforcement of material law cannot be separated from enforcement of formal law, because both run with the aim of realizing a sense of justice for the community. Likewise, the enforcement of judicial decisions: which is a law that must be implemented by the Parties in dispute in it; must be realized for the sake of justice for the entitled Parties. Statistical data reveals that administrative court decisions are often not implemented by administrative agencies/officials. A comparison of the decision execution system between Indonesia and Japan provides an interesting insight into how the two countries, which have different historical backgrounds and judicial systems, enforce the law and execute decisions. This journal focuses on how the policies of the Administrative Court in Indonesia and the Japanese judiciary in executing Inkracht judgments. This analytical comparative study is expected to be a vehicle for scientific and practical exploration related to the fulfillment of rights and obligations for Parties in court disputes. The method used in this research is normative research method with conceptual approach and statutory approach. Some data and statistics from reliable sources are presented as facts that will be analyzed in this journal article..

Keywords:

Execution State Administrative Court Administrative Sanctions

References

Basah, Sjachran. (2001). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Sikap Tindak Administrasi Negara, Bandung: Alumni.

Hadjon, Philipus M. (2004). Penerapan Eksekusi Putusan PTUN Terhadap Pejabat TUN di Daerah, Disampaikan pada Workshop tentang Penerapan Eksekusi Putusan

Harahap, Zairin. (2001). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Indroharto. (1999). Usaha Memahami Undang-undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara buku I beberapa Pengertian Dasar Hukum Tata Negara, Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Indra, M. (2021). Library UI. (Universitas Indonesia) Retrieved Maret 10, 2025, from https://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/old10/124094-PK%20III%20649.8297-Penundaan%20pelaksanaan- Literatur.pdf

Jaelani, A. Q. (2017). The Authority of the State Administrative Court in Adjudicating Disputes Over Fictitious Negative and Fictitious Positive Decisions,. Journal of Legal Supremacy, Vol. 6, No.2, pp. 22. https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v6i2.2019

Kurnia, T. S. (2016). The Indonesian Legal System

Marbun, S F. (2003). Peradilan Administrasi dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Muljadi, Arief, (2005). Landasan dan Prinsip Hukum Otonomi Daerah Dalam Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia, Cet. I, Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.

Nazroen, M. (1999). Masalah-Masalah Sekitar Otonomi Daerah, Jakarta: Wolters.

Pot, Van der, (1990). Handboek van het Nederlands Staatsrecht, WEJ Tjeenk Willink Zwolle.

Prinst, Darwin. (2005). Strategi Menangani Perkara Tata Usaha Negara, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rasyid, Roihan A. (2001). Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Salim, Amarullah. (2000). Peranan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara sebagai Pengawasan Yusticial Terhadap Pemerintah Berdasarkan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Dari Suatu Negara Hukum, Jakarta: Lembaga Administrasi Negara, Departemen Kehakiman.

Soehino. (2000). Perkembangan Pemerintahan Daerah, Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Wade, H. W. R. (2006). Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Author Biographies

David Boy Sumurung Silaban, Universitas Brawijaya

Author Origin : Indonesia

Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara, Universitas Brawijaya

Author Origin : Indonesia

Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo , Universitas Brawijaya

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

David Boy Sumurung Silaban, Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara, & Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo. (2025). THE ENFORCEMENT OF FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE COURT JUDGMENTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN INDONESIA AND JAPAN. International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS), 5(5), 3767–3773. https://doi.org/10.54443/ijerlas.v5i5.3867

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.