COMPARATIVE REGULATION OF “INADMISSIBLE DECISIONS” IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW BETWEEN INDONESIA AND GERMANY
DOI:
10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4280Published:
2025-11-26Downloads
Abstract
This article examines the comparative regulation of “inadmissible decisions” in criminal procedure law between Indonesia and Germany. Comparative law is used as an analytical approach to identify similarities and differences between the two legal systems, aiming to formulate clearer and more systematic procedural norms. Both countries belong to the civil law tradition, which emphasizes codification and legal certainty. Germany recognizes two key mechanisms related to inadmissible decisions, namely Verfahrenshindernis (procedural obstacles) and Unzulässige Anklage (inadmissible indictment). These mechanisms serve as legal filters to ensure procedural compliance and the protection of defendants’ rights before the main trial begins. This study concludes that Germany’s systematic procedural framework offers a valuable model for reformulating the normative and procedural basis of inadmissible decisions in Indonesia.
Keywords:
Comparative Law Inadmissible Decisions Criminal ProcedureReferences
Narendra, Anak Agung Gede Wiweka, I Gusti Bagus Suryawan, and I Made Minggu Widyantara, “Pertimbangan Hukum Terhadap Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum (Ontslag Van Rechtsvervolging),” Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum 1, no. 2 (October 28, 2020).
Vormbaum, Thomas ,2011, “Einführung in die moderne Strafrechtsgeschichte” Berlin, Heidelberg 2011, hlm. 78, diakses pada link https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-662-59963-1 pada 8 September 2025 pukul 10:54 Wita.
Fisher, Howard , 2009, “The German Legal System and Legal Language”, Routledge-Cavendish.
Harahap, M. Yahya , 2015, “Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP. Penyidikan dan Penuntutan”, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Yanti, Sutri, 2021, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Membawa Lari Perempuan Untuk Dikuasai (Studi Pada Putusan Nomor 239/Pid B/2018/PN Bbu)”, tesis pada Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi.
Jamal, Asriani ,2022, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Daluwarsa Penuntutan Pada Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat (Studi Putusan No. 312/Pid.B/2019/PN Cbi)", tesis pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hasanuddin.
Jannati, Windi M.A, Frans Simangunsong, 2022, “Makna Kepentingan Umum Didalam Deponering”, Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, Vol. 2 No. 2 Mei - Agustus 2022, hlm 240.
Soekanto, S. & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bayu Akbar Wicaksono, Milda Istiqomah, Rika Kurniaty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
