ANALYSIS OF IMPORTANT, CAREFUL, CERTAIN AND MUTUALLY AGREEABLE CRITERIA IN THE REGULATION OF ARTICLE 173 OF THE HERZIEN INLANDSCH REGLEMENT REGARDING EVIDENCE OF JUDGES' SUSPECTS
Main Article Content
Naufal Anfasa Firdaus
The sentence in Article 173 HIR which states "important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable" is a regulation that is still abstract and can be interpreted in many ways, where this is like what category of important or very important circumstances are, then what is thorough or precise, how to assess certain conditions, and whether they correspond to each other whether they should be applied to 2 (two) types of evidence or what. The purpose of this study is to analyze the criteria contained in the sentence important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable in the regulation of Article 173 HIR. The research method used is legal research with a statutory regulatory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. Based on the research that has been carried out, it is known that normatively the criteria "important, thorough, certain and mutually agreeable" in Article 173 HIR are not explained completely, then after a theoretical analysis through the doctrines of legal experts and linguistically, namely Indonesian and legal language, the meaning contained therein is obtained. The "important" criterion contains relevant and logical boundaries directly related to the subject matter of the case, the "thorough" criterion contains methodological boundaries for the application of caution, the "certain" criterion contains specific boundaries and the strength of the evidence is not questioned, and the "mutually agreed" criterion contains for consistency and mutually corroborating evidence.
Book
A. Garner (ed.), Bryan, Black’s Law Dictionary, 11th Edition, Thomson Reuters, St. Paul, 2019.
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Edisi Kelima, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi, Jakarta, 2016.
De Saussure, Ferdinand, Course in General Linguistics, Philosophical Library, New York, 1959.
Mahkamah Agung RI, Rangkuman Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung RI, Cetakan kedua, Mahkamah Agung RI, Jakarta, 1993
Retnowulan Sutantio dan Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2002.
R. Subekti, Hukum Acara Perdata, PT Intermasa, Jakarta, 1982.
_________, Hukum Pembuktian, Pradnya Paramitha, Jakarta, 2004.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1993.
_____________________, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2009.
Yahya Harahap, Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2005
Yahya Harahap, Hukum Acara Perdata, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2016.
Jurnal/Artikel
Yeni Novitasari dan Harjono, Kekuatan Alat Bukti Testimonium De Auditu Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Gugatan Perceraian, Jurnal Verstek, Vol. 9, No. 4, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2021.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Herziene Inlandsch Reglement (HIR).
Rechtreglement voor de Buitengewesten (Rbg).
Putusan Pengadilan
Pengadilan Negeri Pamekasan, Putusan Perkara Nomor 16/Pdt.P/2016/ PNPmk.
Pengadilan Negeri Malili, Putusan Perkara Nomor 44/Pdt.G/2018/PNMll.
Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar, Putusan Perkara Nomor 811/Pdt.G/2019/ PNDps.
