THE POSITION OF AN APOSTASY WIFE AS A CAUSE FOR THE DISSOLUTION OF A MARRIAGE IN THE COMPILATION OF ISLAMIC LAW AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR POST-DIVORCE RIGHTS
Main Article Content
Alhadi Saputra
Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
Nur Chanifah
Conversion to religion (apostasy) in Islamic marriage is a complex phenomenon that gives rise to debate between legal norms and social reality. In the context of Indonesian national law, apostasy has not been explicitly regulated in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. This legal gap is filled by the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), which, in Article 116 letter (h), stipulates that conversion to religion or apostasy can be grounds for divorce. However, in religious court practice, there is a disparity in decisions between courts that interpret apostasy as grounds for fasakh (annulment) and those that interpret it as grounds for divorce (talaq). This disparity has legal implications for women's rights after divorce, particularly regarding the right to maintenance during the iddah period, mut'ah, maskan, and kiswah. This study aims to explain the position of a wife who apostatizes as a cause of marital dissolution from the perspective of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) and analyze its legal consequences for post-divorce rights. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and analytical approach. The results of the study indicate that a wife who apostatizes causes the marriage contract to be annulled (fasakh), but in practice, religious courts often still process it through the divorce mechanism (divorce talak) to ensure orderly legal administration. This disparity impacts the different treatment of the rights of apostate wives. From the perspective of legal utility, judges should consider the value of substantive justice and protection for women, even if the woman concerned has left Islam.
Akbar, M. M. F. (2022). Legal Protection for Tolerance and Freedom Among Religious People in Indonesia. Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society, 1(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.15294/ciils.v1i1.56712
Al’anam, M. (2025). Teori Keadilan Perspektif Gustav Radbruch: Hubungan Moral Dan Hukum. Jurnal Humaniora : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Ekonomi Dan Hukum, 9(1), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.30601/humaniora.v9i1.6393
Aulia, T. R. N. A. (2017). Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Bandung: CV. Nuansa Aulia.
Bhudiman, B. & L. R. (2021). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Perceraian Karena Murtad Menurut Hukum Positif. Yustisi Jurnal Hukum & Hukum Islam, Vol. 8, No. 1, 53–64.
Haeratun, H. (2025). Riddah and Its Legal Effects According to the Perspective of Islamic Law and Law No. 1 Year 1974 to Law No. 16 of 2019 Concerning Marriage. Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(5), 2245–2256. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v4i5.215
Mahmud, Muh. A. (2024). PENGANTAR ILMU HUKUM. Semarang: Yoga Pratama.
Putusan 208/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Pst, Pub. L. No. 2019.
Putusan 1727/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Kdl, Pub. L. No. 2020.
Rahardjo, S. (2021). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Siringoringo, M. P. (2022). PENGATURAN DAN PENERAPAN JAMINAN KEBEBASAN BERAGAMA SEBAGAI HAK ASASI MANUSIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF UUD 1945 SEBAGAI HUKUM DASAR NEGARA. Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion, 111–124. https://doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v3i1.618
Syamsuddin, S. (2021). Antara Hukum Murtad dalam Islam dengan Kebebasan Beragama dalam Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). El-Mashlahah, 11(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.23971/elma.v11i1.2623



























