JUSTICE OR EQUALITY? EXAMINING ARTICLE 97 OF THE KHI IN THE CONTEXT OF POST-DIVORCE PROPERTY DIVISION
Main Article Content
Maya Anggraeni Rahmah Permana
Abdul Rachmad Budiono
Hanif Nur Widhiyanti
This study aims to critically analyze the provisions of Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) in the context of the division of joint assets after divorce, emphasizing the need for legal reform that prioritizes the principle of substantive justice. The main issues examined include the extent to which these provisions reflect the principle of substantive justice and how Article 97 of the KHI is implemented in religious court practice. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory, conceptual, and case-based approach. The results show that Article 97 of the KHI is still oriented towards rigid arithmetic equality and does not consider the actual contributions, both material and immaterial, of each party. In judicial practice, a number of judges have implemented progressive interpretations of this norm, which opens up space for the reformulation of Islamic family law in Indonesia. Therefore, this study recommends normative reform of Article 97 of the KHI to include provisions that explicitly accommodate proportional division of assets, as well as implementing steps in the form of training on a substantive justice perspective for judges.
Adlhiyati, Zakki, and Achmad Achmad. ‘Melacak Keadilan Dalam Regulasi Poligami: Kajian Filsafat Keadilan Aristoteles, Thomas Aquinas, Dan John Rawls’. Undang: Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 2 (2019): 409–31. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.2.409-431.
Afrizal, and Al Kodri. ‘PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA (Studi Analisis Pasal 97 Kompilasi Hukum Islam Dalam Persepktif Maqashid Syariah)’. Islamic Law Journal 1, no. 1 (January 2023): 47–61.
Ahmad, Abu Umar Faruq, and Mohammad Ashraful Mobin. ‘Promoting Maqashid Al-Shari’ah and Achieving Sustainable Economic Development: The Potential of Proposed Two Tier Mudarabah Business Model on Cash Waqf’. Media Syari’ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial 19, no. 1 (2017): 1–36. https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v17i1.1926.
Anggraeni, Dista, and Novi Damayanti. ‘Penegakan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan Di Indonesia’. Indigenous Knowledge 1, no. 2 (June 2023): 2.
Anwar, Anwar. ‘Problematika Mewujudkan Keadilan Substantif Dalam Penegakkan Hukum Di Indonesia’. Jurnal Konstitusi 3, no. 1 (2010): 115914.
Ashsubli, Muhammad. ‘Undang-Undang Perkawinan Dalam Pluralitas Hukum Agama (Judicial Review Pasal Perkawinan Beda Agama)’. Jurnal Cita Hukum 2, no. 2 (2015): 40841.
Dra. Hj. Muhayah, S.H.,M.H. ‘PERTIMBANGAN PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA [Dra. Hj. Muhayah, S.H.,M.H]’. Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Samarinda, 2024. https://pta-samarinda.go.id/artikel-pengadilan/2217-pertimbangan-putusan-hakim-dalam-pembagian-harta-bersama.
Edmundson, William A. ‘John Rawls: Reticent Socialist’. Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Fitrianingrum, Fatimah Azzahra, Achmad Hasan Basri, and Rohmad Agus Solihin. ‘Asas Contra Legem Dalam Pembagian Harta Bersama (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Surabaya Nomor 231/Pdt.G/2022/PTA.Sby)’. Syariati: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hukum 10, no. 1 (May 2024): 79–94. https://doi.org/10.32699/syariati.v10i1.6725.
Fatimah Fayrus. ‘Analisis Putusan Pembagian Harta Bersama Pada Pengadilan Agama Kelas IA Yogyakarta Ditinjau Dari Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, Dan Kemanfaatan’. Program Pascasarjana Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Gajdah Mada, 2001.
Kang, Jian, Yan Zhu, Yinglong Xia, Jiebo Luo, and Hanghang Tong. ‘RawlsGCN: Towards Rawlsian Difference Principle on Graph Convolutional Network’. Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022 (New York, NY, USA), WWW ’22, Association for Computing Machinery, 25 April 2022, 1214–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512169.
Mahmud, Peter Marzuki. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2016.
Mencari, Pembagian Harta Bersama Istri Turur. ‘Pembagian Harta Bersama Istri Turut Mencari Nafkah Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia’. El-Izdiwaj Indonesian Journal of Civil and Islamic Family Law 2, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.24042/el-izdiwaj.v2i2.11041.
Muhtar, Mohamad Hidayat, Dian Dewi Khasanah, Avisena Aulia Anita, Muhamad Abas, Moh Bagus, Dewi Cahyandari, Endrianto Bayu Setiawan, et al. Menimbang Keadilan: Dinamika Hukum dan Demokrasi Di Persimpangan Zaman. Sada Kurnia Pustaka, 2024.
Pujayanti, Luh Putu Vera Astri, Zainun Zakya Nugrahayu, Erman I. Rahim, Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, and Chami Yassine. ‘Indonesia’s Constitutional Court: Bastion of Law Enforcement and Protector of Human Rights in The Reform Era’. Jurnal Pamator : Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo 17, no. 1 (February 2024): 1. https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v17i1.24128.
Ristianawati, Eka. ‘Joint Property Distribution upon Divorce Reviewed from the Contribution of Husband and Wife in the Household’. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) 3, no. 1 (2021): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2021.3.1.8078.
Suwito, Deni Setiyawan, Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, and Ahmad. ‘Contemplating the Morality of Law Enforcement in Indonesia’. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development 11, no. 10 (October 2023): e1261–e1261. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1261.
Umar, Wahyudi, Rasmuddin, and Andi Hikmawanti. ‘PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM: IMPLEMENTASI MORAL JUSTICE DAN SOCIAL JUSTICE’. Jurnal Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 5, no. 1 (March 2023): 11–17. https://doi.org/10.47435/al-ahkam.v5i1.1724.
Ungel, Jamhuri, Rispalman Rispalman, and Taufiq Hidayat. ‘Pengabaian Nafkah Dalam Proses Perceraian Di Kecamatan Pintu Rime Gayo Kabupaten Bener Meriah’. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 3, no. 2 (August 2020): 259–88. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v3i2.7678.
Yudisial, Komisi. ‘Problematika Hakim Dalam Ranah Hukum, Pengadilan, Dan Masyarakat Di Indonesia: Studi Sosio-Legal’. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2017. https://komisiyudisial.go.id/storage/assets/uploads/files/Problematika-Hakim-dalam-Ranah-Hukum-Pengadilan-Masyarakat-di-Indonesia.pdf.
