Juridical Analysis of the Principles of Transparency and Accountability in the Procurement of Government Goods/Services
DOI:
10.5281/zenodo.20685574Published:
2025-09-30Downloads
Abstract
Digital transformation in government procurement of goods/services through the Electronic Procurement System (SPSE) brings efficiency and transparency, but also creates new vulnerabilities to the security of electronic data and documents. This study aims to analyze the legal protection of electronic data and documents in SPSE, identify protection gaps, and formulate recommendations for improvement. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative, conceptual, and comparative approach, supported by case studies and limited interviews with procurement officials and SPSE administrators. The results of the study show three main findings. First, cybersecurity vulnerabilities are still high, as evidenced by the leakage of 11,507 LPSE credential data in 2022 and 593 national cyber incidents in 2024. Second, while technical standards such as RSA encryption and two-factor authentication have been implemented, interagency compliance is uneven, and about 30% of procurement is not fully digital, creating security gaps. Third, human resource capacity is the weakest point, with a password management awareness level of only 79.81% and phishing attacks are still rampant. This study concludes that the legal protection of electronic data in government procurement still faces gaps between regulation and implementation, weak sanction mechanisms, and lack of human resource competence. Regulatory harmonization, periodic security audits, mandatory cybersecurity certification for procurement officials, and strict law enforcement against data breaches are needed. Without a comprehensive overhaul, integrity and trust in e-procurement will continue to be threatened.Keywords:
Legal Protection Electronic Data Electronic Documents Government Procurement of Goods/Services, SPSE CybersecurityReferences
Betham, A. A. A., Hipan, N., & Fality, F. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Prosedur Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Serta Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Pengadaan Barang/Jasa. Jurnal Yustisiabel, 3(2), 191–212.
Chaidir, E., Abadi, M. H., Suparto, S., Bur, A., Ibnususilo, E., Wira, W., Muslikah, U., & Akbar, A. (2020). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.
Dwiyanto, A. (2021). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. Ugm Press.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.
Hastuti, I. F. (2013). Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah (LKPP). Universitas Mercu Buana.
Mardiasmo, M. B. A. (2021). Otonomi & manajemen keuangan daerah: edisi terbaru. Penerbit Andi.
Meckling, W. H., & Jensen, M. C. (1976). Theory of the Firm. Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, 3(4), 305–360.
Pengadaan.or.id. (2026). Menyambut Era Baru: Bedah Tuntas Poin Krusial Perpres 46/2025. Published 14 April 2026. https://pengadaan.or.id/2026/04/14/menyambut-era-baru-bedah-tuntas-poin-krusial-perpres-46-2025/
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 46 Tahun 2025 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2025 Nomor 67. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
Ridwan, I. H. J., & Sudrajat, M. H. A. S. (2020). Hukum administrasi Negara dan kebijakan pelayanan publik. Nuansa Cendekia.
Roring, E. B. (2025). Dekonstruksi Marwah Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Krisis Legitimasi Tafsir Etika Konstitusional. Politika Progresif: Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Humaniora, 2(2), 152–164.
Sedarmayanti. (2018). Hubungan Budaya Kerja dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Peningkatan Kinerja Pegawai Pada Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 15(1), 63-77.
Septianingsih, C. A. (2022). Analisis Perencanaan Pengadaan Dan Sistem Pengadaan Barang Jasa Secara Elektronik (E-Procurement) Dalam Mewujudkan Transparansi Dan Akuntabilitas.
Sinaga, A. T. D. (2021). ANALISIS KOORDINASI ANTARA KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI (KPK) DAN KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA (KPPU) DALAM PENYELIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI BIDANG PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA.
Suryati, S., Sardana, L., Disurya, R., & Putra, Y. S. (2024). Penguatan Literasi Digital Dalam Pencegahan Pelanggaran Hukum Siber (Cyber Law). Wajah Hukum, 8(1), 84–94.
Sutalhis, M., & Novaria, E. (2024). Literasi digital dan pelayanan publik yang baik. ACADEMIA: Jurnal Inovasi Riset Akademik, 4(1), 17–23.
Taufik, T. (2020). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Oleh Pemerintah. TAJDID: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Dan Kemanusiaan, 4(2), 184–193.
Yoon, D. (2023). The improvement policy design of public procurement process for the public management innovation in South Korea. Sage Open, 13(1), 21582440231158260.
Zainuddin, M., & Karina, A. D. (2023). Penggunaan Metode Yuridis Normatif Dalam Membuktikan Kebenaran Pada Penelitian Hukum. Smart Law Journal, 2(2), 114–123.
Zed, M. (n.d.). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Hukumonline. (2025). Perpres 46/2025 Berpotensi Buka Celah Penyimpangan. Hukumonline.com, 12 June 2025. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/perpres-46-2025-berpotensi-buka-celah-penyimpangan-lt684a31ceb442d
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmad Feri Tanjung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
