Degradation of Proof of Certificate of Title through Complete Systematic Land Registration in Civil Disputes
DOI:
10.5281/zenodo.21633513Published:
2025-07-30Downloads
Abstract
The Certificate of Ownership of the Complete Systematic Land Registration serves as an important means of proof in ensuring legal certainty of land rights. However, in civil disputes, the evidentiary strength can be weakened if the certificate issuance process is not supported by legal grounds, physical data, juridical data, and accurate verification. This study aims to analyze the degradation of the proof of Certificate of Property Rights through Complete Systematic Land Registration in civil disputes. The research uses a document-based empirical juridical method with a case study approach to Decision Number 221/Pdt.G/2024/PN Byw. Data was collected through literature studies and documentation of court decisions, land regulations, land registration documents, and related legal literature. The analysis was carried out using qualitative content analysis and legal arguments through codification of the basis of rights, physical data, juridical data, systematic land registration procedures, and judges' considerations. The results of the study showed that the degradation of evidence occurred due to data inconsistency with the village administration, weak research on the basis of rights, conflict of interest in the verification process, and lack of optimal institutional control before the certificate was issued. A certificate of title is not seen as absolute evidence, but rather a strong piece of evidence that can be broken by more convincing evidence of inheritance, land history, and possession facts. This study emphasizes the importance of independent verification, land data validation, and strengthening the accountability of Complete Systematic Land Registration to prevent disputes and increase the evidentiary strength of certificates.Keywords:
degradation of proof Certificate of Ownership Complete systematic land registration civil disputes Land ProofReferences
Apriyadi, S., Meilano, I., Hernandi, A., Handayani, A. P., & Mahyeda, A. (2025). Cost efficiency analysis in integrated cadastre mapping system through an operational management approach. Land, 14(4), 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14040699
Bhat, P. I. (2020). Idea and methods of legal research. Oxford University Press.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Fetai, B., Tekavec, J., Fras, M. K., & Lisec, A. (2022). Inconsistencies in cadastral boundary data Digitisation and maintenance. Land, 11(12), 2318. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122318
Huda, N., Hernandi, A., Gumilar, I., Meilano, I., & Cahyaningtyas, L. A. (2024). The strategic development of quality improvement land data incrementally using integrated PESTEL and SWOT analysis in Indonesia. Land, 13(10), 1655. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101655
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah.
Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap.
Li, L., Gao, H., Song, B., & Cui, C. (2024). How to use evidence rules reasonably to resolve land disputes: Analysis of typical land dispute cases from China. Land, 13(8), 1187. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081187
Martono, D. B., Aditya, T., Subaryono, S., & Nugroho, P. (2022). Cadastre typology as a baseline for incremental improvement of spatial cadastre in Jakarta: Towards a complete cadastre. Land, 11(10), 1732. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101732
Ndugwa, R. P., & Omusula, C. K. (2025). Institutional frameworks, policies, and land data: Insights from monitoring land governance and tenure security in the context of sustainable development goals in Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, and Zambia. Land, 14(5), 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14050960
Pengadilan Negeri Banyuwangi. (2025). Putusan Nomor 221/Pdt.G/2024/PN Byw.
Prabajati, H. H., Meilano, I., Hernandi, A., Saptari, A. Y., Sadarviana, V., Syaputra, R. A., & Nadiyah, N. U. (2025). Forensic cadastre approach in resolving land disputes: Majalengka Regency as case study. Land, 14(5), 972. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14050972
Salehijam, M. (2018). The value of systematic content analysis in legal research. Tilburg Law Review, 23(1–2), 34–42.
Tesfaye, B., Lengoiboni, M., Zevenbergen, J., & Simane, B. (2023). Rethinking the impact of land certification on tenure security, land disputes, land management, and agricultural production: Insights from South Wello, Ethiopia. Land, 12(9), 1713. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12091713
Webley, L. (2012). Qualitative approaches to empirical legal research. In P. Cane & H. M. Kritzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of empirical legal research (pp. 926–950). Oxford University Press.
Downloads
How to Cite
