THE URGENCY OF FORCED MONEY REGULATION IN THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: NORMATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISMS
DOI:
10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4320Published:
2025-11-17Downloads
Abstract
The regulation of forced money (dwangsom) within the State Administrative Court is an important instrument to ensure compliance of state administrative officials with court decisions that have permanent legal force. However, until now the regulations governing the mechanism for the implementation of forced money in the PTUN are still unclear, so it often causes obstacles in the practice of execution. This study aims to analyze the urgency of the regulation of forced money in the State Administrative Court by focusing on the implementation mechanism so that it can be implemented effectively. The research method used is a prescriptive method with a normative approach, namely examining applicable laws and regulations, legal doctrines, and relevant court decisions. The results of the study show that the absence of strict regulations regarding the implementation of forced money creates legal uncertainty and has the potential to weaken the function of the PTUN as judicial control over government administrative actions. Therefore, a more comprehensive regulation is needed regarding the mechanisms, procedures, and parameters of the implementation of forced money in order to provide legal certainty, ensure the effectiveness of the execution of decisions, and strengthen the principle of the rule of law in the administration of government.
Keywords:
Forced Money State Administrative Court Execution of Judgments.References
Asshiddiqie, J. (2020). Hukum acara peradilan tata usaha negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Fachruddin, I. (2004). Pengantar hukum administrasi negara Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Hadjon, P. M. (1997). Pengantar hukum administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Indrayana, D. (2019). Reformasi hukum dan peradilan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kompas.
Indroharto. (1993). Usaha memahami undang-undang tentang peradilan tata usaha negara. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Lotulung, P. E. (1993). Peradilan tata usaha negara dan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Lotulung, P. E. (2000). Hukum tata usaha negara dan kekuasaan. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Mertokusumo, S. (1993). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Prosser, W. L. (1955). Handbook of the law of torts (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
Ridwan HR. (2011). Hukum administrasi negara. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Rivero, J. (1966). Droit administratif. Paris: Dalloz.
Soekanto, S. (1983). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali.
Supandi. (2018). Hukum acara peradilan tata usaha negara: Teori dan praktik. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2024). Laporan evaluasi eksekusi putusan PTUN melalui aplikasi MONEKSTUN. Jakarta: Badan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ferio Wabarca Hutabarat, Shinta Hadiyantina, Sudarsono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
