REFORMULATION OF THE CONCEPT OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM THROUGH LEGAL DISCOVERIES AND BREAKTHROUGHS AFTER THE NATIONAL CRIMINAL CODE AS AN EFFORT TO BALANCE THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY AND SUBSTANTIVE JUSTICE
DOI:
10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4942Published:
2026-01-18Downloads
Abstract
Certainty law as fundamental principles of the Indonesian state of law are often face tension with demands justice substantive in practice justice criminal law , especially in the middle dynamics social and developmental type crimes that are not fully accommodated by law positive . Condition the push emergence practice judicial activism as response on limitations of written norms , in particular through invention law ( rechtsvinding ) and breakthrough legal breakthrough . Although get legitimacy juridical through Constitution Power National Judiciary and Criminal Code, practice judicial activism Not yet accompanied by clear settings about its limitations and parameters , so that potential cause uncertainty law , inconsistency decision , and exceedance authority judicial . This article aim For analyze typology form judicial activism carried out by judges in practice justice Indonesian criminal law and formulate a reformulation model draft ideal judicial activism to balance principle certainty law and justice substantive in implementation of the National Criminal Code. Research This use method juridical normative with approach legislation and approaches conceptual , through analysis to regulation legislation , jurisprudence , and doctrine law . Research results show that judicial activism in practice justice criminal present in three typology main , namely through method interpretation law , construction law , and breakthroughs law that goes beyond normative limits . This article propose a reformulation model judicial activism based seven fundamental parameters that are hierarchical and cumulative . This model expected capable give corridor clear normative for judges to engage in judicial activism still measurable , accountable , and non- shift become arbitrariness judicial , at the same time ensure realization balance between certainty law and justice substantive in system justice Indonesian criminal law .
Keywords:
certainty law justice substantive judicial activism discovery law National Criminal Code.References
Abdulkadir Muhammad, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2004.
Achmad Ali, Menguak Tabir Hukum: Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis, Chandra Pratama, Jakarta, 1993.
Asikin Zainal, Pengantar Tata Hukum Indonesia, Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 2012.
Bagus Surya Prabowo, Menggagas Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Presidential Threshold di Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jurnal Konstitusi, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi’yah, Volume 19, Nomor 1, 2022.
Bambang Sutiyoso, Metode Penemuan Hukum: Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum yang Pasti dan Berkeadilan, Yogyakarta, UII Press.
Indriati Amarini, Implementation of Judicial Activism in Judge’s Decision, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Volume 8, Nomor 1, 2019.
Jazim Hamidi, Hermeneutika Hukum, Sejarah, Filasafat, dan Metode Tafsir, UB Press, Malang, 2011.
Muwahid, Metode Penemuan Hukum (Rechtsvinding) oleh Hakim dalam Upaya mewujudkan Hukum yang Responsif, Jurnal Al-Hukama The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law, Volume 7, Nomor 1, 2017.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2014.
Shidarta, Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta, 2013.
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 1990.
Wiwin Dwi Ratna Febriyanti, Penemuan Hukum (Rechtsvinding) dan Pembentukan Hukum (Rechtsschepping) dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia, Jurnal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization, Volume 13, Nomor 2, 2025.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Entang Nuryanto, Prija Djatmika, Abdul Madjid

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

