Reconstruction of the Formulation of Rehabilitation Sanctions for Narcotics Abusers from the Perspective of Criminal Law Policy
DOI:
10.5281/zenodo.20139307Published:
2026-03-31Downloads
Abstract
Indonesia's narcotics criminal law policy continues to reflect normative tensions between a repressive criminalization approach and a rehabilitative paradigm. Although the law recognizes narcotics abusers as individuals requiring recovery, law enforcement practices remain predominantly imprisonment-oriented because rehabilitation is positioned as an alternative rather than a primary sanction. This study aims to examine: (1) the weaknesses in the formulation of rehabilitation sanctions within Indonesian criminal law policy, and (2) the normative reconstruction model capable of positioning rehabilitation as the primary response to narcotics abusers. This research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches. The data sources consist of primary legal materials, including the Narcotics Law and the Criminal Code, supported by secondary and tertiary legal materials analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation and juridical reasoning. The findings reveal that the principal weakness lies in the formulation of Articles 103 and 127 of the Narcotics Law, as well as the absence of explicit rehabilitation provisions in the new Criminal Code, resulting in legal ambiguity and disparities in judicial decisions. Consequently, correctional institutions experience severe overcrowding, with more than 40 percent of inmates being narcotics offenders, while prisons increasingly function as spaces for the reproduction of crime rather than rehabilitation. This study recommends reconstructing the sanction formulation through revision of Article 609 of the Criminal Code to clearly distinguish narcotics abuse from illicit trafficking, alongside transforming the integrated assessment mechanism from discretionary authority into an imperative normative obligation. The originality of this research lies in shifting the analytical focus from implementation issues to the formulation of criminal law policy and developing a normative reconstruction model integrating therapeutic jurisprudence and restorative justice within the national criminal justice system.
Keywords:
Reconstruction Formulation Rehabilitation Sanctions Abuser Narcotics Criminal Law Policy Restorative JusticeReferences
Ahlin, E. M., & Douds, A. S. (Eds. . (2023). Taking Problem-Solving Courts to Scale: Diverse Applications of the Specialty Court Model. Lexington Books.
Ancel, M. (1975). Toward a Systematic Study of Criminal Policy Problems. Archives de Politique Criminelle, 1(1), 15—42. https://doi.org/National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) Angkasa, R. A. (2023). Diversion and Restorative Justice in Drug Cases: The Urgency of Pre-Trial Diversion Mechanism. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(2), 613–648. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i2.71234
Anis Widyawati, Ade Adhari, Ridwan Arifin, Helda Rahmasari, H. S. (2025). Crafting an ideal penitentiary law: a global comparative framework for Indonesia's correctional system. Legality: Scientific Journal of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, 33(2), 334–360. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i2.40358
Ariani, N. V., Md.Isa@Yusuff, Y., & Yusof, Y. (2025). Reforming Indonesia’s Drug Sentencing Law: Normative, Comparative and Restorative Justice Perspectives. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 10(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.30935/jcasc/15867
Bagus Satrio Wibowo, Zainal Asikin, A. A. (2021). Application of Integrated Assessment in Law Enforcement against Narcotics Abusers. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (IJMMU), 8(4), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i4.2506
Evans, E.A., et al. (2022). Recidivism and mortality after in-jail buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 231, 109254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109254
Freiberg, A. (2025). Reflections on 50 years of sentencing reform: The good, the bad, and the future. Alternative Law Journal, 50(2), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X251323921 Hamja Hamja, Dey Ravena, Amad Sudiro, B. P. N. (2025). The Real Solutions to the Ignored Prison Overcrowding Problem. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia (Sultan Agung Islamic University), 7, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v7i3.43855
Hartato Pakpahan, I Nyoman Nurjaya, Setiawan Nurdayasakti, N. A. (2024). Reformulating Indonesia’s Narcotics Law on Personal Drug Misuse: A Humanist Approach. Journal of Asian Social Science Research, 6(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15575/jassr.v6i2.104
Inbal Peleg-Koriat, D. W.-S. (2024). Restorative Justice Behind Bars: People in Custody’s Facilitators and Barriers to Participating in Restorative Justice Penulis: Nama Jurnal: Volume: Nomor: Halaman: DOI: Criminal Justice and Behavior, 51(10), 1493–1510. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548241257608
Jeremy Bentham. (2009). The Rationale of Punishment (J. T. McHugh (ed.)). Prometheus Books. Johnson, K. L., Patel, S. V., Cance, J., Rodriguez Borja, I., Christopher, M. C., Counts, J., Desjardins, M., Philbrick, S. M., Beletsky, L., & Ray, B. (2025). Implementation of harm reduction strategies in criminal-legal systems: a scoping review of the literature. Health and Justice, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-025-00369-x
Khudzaifah Dimyati, Sri Waljinah, Kelik Wardiono, Muchamad Iksan, Arief Budiono, P. W. A. (2025). New Paradigm in Legal Research: The Normative Object Approach in the Criminal Case Investigation Process. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 14, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis 2025-0042
Marasabessy, F., Sugiri, B., & Ratnohadi, H. (2025). Non-Penal Policy in Prosecution Termination (Reconstructing Criminal Law Through Restorative Justice). Iblam Law Review, 5(2), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v5i2.605
Maulana Pratama, D., and Hamzah, I. (2025). Preventing Narcotics Abuse Through a Rehabilitative Approach. Marinews - Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
Nevey Varida Ariani, Yusramizza Md.Isa@Yusuff, Yuhanif Yusof, A. S. M. S. (2025). Reforming Indonesia’s Drug Sentencing Law: Normative, Comparative and Restorative Justice Perspectives. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 10(2), 3301–3313. https://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v10i2.2099
Novalina Novalina, Khalisah Hayatuddin, Erli Salia, Hambali Yusuf, M. S. I. (2024). The Legal Protection against Accountability for Criminal Acts of Narcotics Abuse in Indonesia. Law Development Journal (UNISSULA), 6, 239–251. https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.v6i2.37456
Pakpahan, H., & Et al. (2024). Reformulating Indonesia ’ s Narcotics Law on Personal Drug Misuse : A Humanist Approach. Journal of Asian Social Science Research, 6(6), 209–232.
Parindo, D. (2025). A Legal Review of Court Decisions on the Rehabilitation of Drug Abusers from a Restorative Justice Perspective. Indonesian Law Journal, 4, 4. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15283436
Pozen, D. (2024). Humane and Proportionate Punishment (dalam The Constitution of the War on Drugs) (G. R. Stone (ed.)). Oxford University Press.
Pulungan, S. H., Soponyono, E., & Purnomo, S. (2024). Reforming Indonesia’s Approach to Narcotics Offenses: A Call for Rehabilitation over Incarceration. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, 249–253. https://doi.org/10.70135/seejph.vi.1473
Sánchez-Valdivia, N., Barbaglia, M. G., Olivella-Cirici, M., Girona Marcos, N., Gotsens, M., Garrido Albaina, A., Rius, C., Bartroli, M., & Pérez, G. (2023). Community outbreak of COVID-19 among people who use drugs attending a harm reduction center in Barcelona, Spain. Harm Reduction Journal, 20(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-023-00804-y
Santosa, R. A. (2025). Formulation of Settlement of Criminal Cases of Drug Addicts by Prosecutors Using a Restorative Justice Approach. 20(4), 3942–3950.
Sears, E., & Qayum, A. (2024). Understanding and managing drug trafficking in prison. A rapid evidence assessment (REA). Forensic Update, 145, 40–54. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsfu.2024.1.145.40 Syawal, M. (2024). A Comparison of Indonesia and Malaysia's Imprisonment Policy for Drug Abusers. 248–257. rl: https://fh.unair.ac.id/proceedings/index.php/aicoll/article/view/30
Tešović, O. (2024). Problem-solving courts in comparative law: Combination of therapy and responsibility. NBP: Nauka, Bezbednost, Policija (Journal of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies), 29, 134– 150. https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo29-48482
Wardani, D. F. (2024). Critical Review of the Disparity of Criminal Decisions in Narcotics Crime Cases. JOURNAL OF LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.15294/arls.vol1i4.10557
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sutan Siregar, Muksana Pasaribu, Putoro Dongoran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
