THE HARMONIZING INSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE STATE FINANCIAL LOSSES IN CORRUPTION CASES
DOI:
10.54443/ijerlas.v6i1.4684Published:
2025-12-09Downloads
Abstract
The disharmony in authority among various institutions including the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK), the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (BPKP), the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), Inspectorates, Regional Apparatus Work Units (SKPD), Public Accountants, and Judges in calculating state financial losses in corruption crime cases has led to legal uncertainty and debates over which institution holds the legitimate authority to determine such losses. Through juridical, philosophical, and sociological analysis, this study finds that the source of disharmony lies in the ambiguous norms of the Corruption Crime Law, which does not explicitly designate a single institution authorized to determine state losses. Based on its constitutional position, this research asserts the urgency of establishing BPK as the sole institution authorized to calculate state losses, accompanied by vertical harmonization of the roles of other institutions, strengthening of BPK's institutional capacity, standardization of audit methodologies, and a reaffirmation of corruption as a serious crime requiring evidentiary certainty. This study concludes that harmonizing authorities is an urgent step to strengthen the effectiveness and integrity of corruption law enforcement while enhancing public trust in Indonesia's anti-corruption mechanisms.
Keywords:
Corruption Eradication State Financial Loss Harmonization of Authority Criminal Justice SystemReferences
Achmad Ali, Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis), Toko Gunung Agung, Jakarta, 2002.
Bahir Muhammad, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jejak Pustaka, Yogyakarta, 2022.
Bambang Sunggono, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2015.
Bambang Waluyo, Penelitian Hukum dalam Praktik, Sinar Grafika, Sinar Grafika, 2008.
David Cohen, dkk., Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Pasca 2009, The East-West Center (EWC), Jakarta, 2022.
Efi Laila Kholis, Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Dalam Perkara Korupsi, Cetakan Pertama, Solusi Publishing, Jakarta, 2010.
Indriyanto Seno Adji, Korupsi dan Penegakan Hukum, FH UII Press,Yogyakarta, 2009.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, Buku Panduan untuk memehami tindak pidana korupsi, Jakarta, 2006.
Lilik Muyadi, Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia, Alumni Bandung, Bandung, 2007.
M. Yahya Harahap., Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2006.
Mardjono Reksodiputro, Menyelaraskan Pembaruan Hukum, Cet. 1, Komisi Hukum Nasional, Jakarta, 2009.
R. Bayu Ferdian, dkk, “Penetapan Kerugian Negara Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi” (Syiah Kuala Law Journal: Vol. 2(3) Desember 2018.
Theodorus M. Tuanakotta, Menghitung Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Salemba Empat, Jakarta, 2009.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dian Devananda Akbar, Prija Djatmika, Nurini Aprilianda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
