THE APPLICABILITY OF LEGAL RULES ON FICTITIOUS NEGATIVE DECISIONS AND FICTITIOUS POSITIVE DECISIONS
DOI:
10.54443/ijerlas.v5i2.2649Published:
2025-03-23Downloads
Abstract
The objective of this study is to examine the legal validity of Negative and Positive Fictitious Decisions from the perspective of state administrative law. This study uses normative legal research methods by analyzing variety of literature. The research methods is based on legislationand uses secondary data consistin primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, presented in a wualitative descriptive manner. The findings indicate that the authority of the PTUN to Adjudging disputes of positive fictitious disputes has been removed in the provisions of Article 175 of the Job Creation Law and the provisions for derogation (revocation) of the provisions of Article 3 of the Peratun Law are not regulated in the State Administration Law and the Job Creation Law, so the principle of preference lex posteriori derogat lex priori is no longer appropriate to use. Additionally, the PTUN authority standards that attempt both positive and negative fake disagreements are no longer in conflict. Since the PTUN still has the authority to attempt Negative Fictitious, Positive Fictitious essentially has the executive's complete authority. Therefore, one example of a legal safeguard for citizens against false judgments made by government officials is the requirements of Article 3 of the Peratun Law.
Keywords:
Negative fictitious, Positive fictitious, Job Creation Law.References
Abrianto, B. O., Hartono, J., & Kosuma, I. P. (2023). Problems of State Administrative Decisions of a Fictitious Positive Nature After Law Number 11 of 2020. Arena Journal of Legal Science, Vol. 16 No.(3), pp.532-556. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01603.5
Agung, M. (2011). Developments in the State Administrative Court and the Fundamentals of State Administrative Law from Several Perspectives. Bogor.
Hadjon, P. M., Martosoeignjo, R. S., Basah, S., Manan, B., Marzuki, H. L., Berge, J., Stroink, F. (2008). Introduction to Indonesian Administrative Law. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Heriyanto, B. (2019). Problems of Resolving “Fictitious Positive” Cases in the State Administrative Court. Pakuan Law Riview, Vol.5, No.1, pp.39-40. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v5i1.1185
HR, R. (2016). State Administrative Law, Revised Edition. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Indra, M. (2021). Library UI. (Universitas Indonesia) Retrieved Maret 10, 2025, from https://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/old10/124094-PK%20III%20649.8297-Penundaan%20pelaksanaan-Literatur.pdf
Jaelani, A. Q. (2017). The Authority of the State Administrative Court in Adjudicating Disputes Over Fictitious Negative and Fictitious Positive Decisions,. Journal of Legal Supremacy, Vol. 6, No.2, pp. 22. https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v6i2.2019
Kurnia, T. S. (2016). The Indonesian Legal System: An Initial Understanding. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.
Nugraha, S., Hayati, T., Erliyana, A., & Mamudji, S. (2007). State Administrative Law. Depok: Faculty of Law Publishing Body, University of Indonesia.
Pranoto, E., & Sudarmanto, K. (2023). The Principle of Positive Fiction Post the Implementation of the Job Creation Law: Prophetic Legal Paradigm. IUS Journal of Law and Justice Studies, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp.46-59. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i1.1168
Purbopranoto, K. (2018). Several Notes on State Administrative Law and State Administrative Courts, Alumni, In Sudarsono, Legal Issues in the Post-Reform State Administrative Court, Procedural Law and Electronic Courts. Jakarta: Kencana.
Simanjuntak, E., Rahman, A. M., Dani, U., Cahyati, N. D., & Susmito, H. A. (2021). Abalysisi and Inventory of Legal Technical Problems on the Influence of the Job Creation Law on the Absolute Competence of the State Administrative Court, Especially in the Legal Issue of Fictitious Positive. Jakarta: Kencana.
Simanjuntak, E. (2022). Materials on the Difference Between Active Actions (Commission) and Passive Actions (Omission), Training on Disputes Over Government Actions and the Authority of the State Administrative Court to Adjudicate Unlawful Acts of Rulers (Ontrechmatige Overheids. Judicial Training and Learning Centre. Bogor.
Soeprapto, M. F. (2007). The Science of Legislation 1: Types, Functions and Content. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Wairocana, I. N., Layang, I. B., Sudiarto, I. K., Martana, P. A., Sudiarawan, K. A., & Hermanto, B. (2019). bstacles and Methods for State Administrative Court Judges Post Government Administration Law: An Approach to Handling Fictitious Positive Cases. Journal of Law and Development, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp.13-33. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01603.5
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jenrison Nainggolan, Aan Eko Widiarto, Sudarsono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
